H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sabina Simmonds vs Helena Sukova H2H: 1-2
Helena Sukova holds a 2–1 lead over Sabina Simmonds in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Helena Sukova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Helena Sukova won the 1986 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 66
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Helena Sukova | 6-1 6-2 | Sabina Simmonds | Match data |
| Oct 28, 1982* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sabina Simmonds | 6-3 6-1 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
| Mar 22, 1982* | Austin | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Helena Sukova | 6-4 6-1 | Sabina Simmonds | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabina Simmonds | — | — | — | 1,830 | 108 | 122 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Helena Sukova | #102 | #4 | 735 | 2,217 | 580 | 297 | 66.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sabina Simmonds | Helena Sukova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1977 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #7 | 2,041 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1980 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 2,028 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1981 | 21–10 | 67.7% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 69–21 | 76.7% | #6 | 2,151 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1982 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 58–19 | 75.3% | #7 | 2,129 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1983 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,120 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1984 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1985 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #14 | 2,025 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 1,958 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,925 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,889 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #35 | 1,792 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,637 | 0 | 9 |