H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sabina Simmonds vs Lilian Drescher H2H: 1-1
Sabina Simmonds and Lilian Drescher are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lilian Drescher leads 1–0 on clay, while Sabina Simmonds leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sabina Simmonds won the 1982 US Open first round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1982* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Sabina Simmonds | 6-3 6-2 | Lilian Drescher | Match data |
| Apr 3, 1981* | Nascosa | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Lilian Drescher | 6-4 6-3 | Sabina Simmonds | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabina Simmonds | — | — | — | 1,830 | 108 | 122 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Lilian Drescher | — | — | — | 1,716 | 63 | 71 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sabina Simmonds | Lilian Drescher | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1977 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 10–3 | 76.9% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1979 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1980 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1981 | 21–10 | 67.7% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1982 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1983 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1984 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1985 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |