H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sabina Simmonds vs Petra Delhees Jauch H2H: 2-1

Sabina Simmonds holds a 2–1 lead over Petra Delhees Jauch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sabina Simmonds leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Petra Delhees Jauch won the 1983 Roland Garros round of 128 6-1 6-2.

H2H
2 1
3 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Petra Delhees Jauch 6-1 6-2 Sabina Simmonds Match data May 25, 1983* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Sabina Simmonds 6-0 7-6 Petra Delhees Jauch Match data Feb 2, 1983* R32 Palm Beach WTA 250 Clay
Sabina Simmonds 3-6 7-5 7-6 Petra Delhees Jauch Match data Apr 10, 1979* SF Monte Carlo WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sabina Simmonds 1,830 108 123 46.8% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Petra Delhees Jauch 1,719 69 91 43.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Sabina Simmonds Petra Delhees Jauch
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1974 0–2 0.0% 1,476 0 0 1975 0–1 0.0% 1,483 0 0
1975 2–4 33.3% 1,470 0 0 1976 0–3 0.0% 1,466 0 0
1976 5–7 41.7% 1,526 0 0 1977 0–1 0.0% 1,450 0 0
1977 3–9 25.0% 1,525 0 0 1978 6–6 50.0% 1,533 0 0
1978 15–15 50.0% 1,609 0 0 1979 12–8 60.0% 1,652 0 1
1979 15–10 60.0% 1,669 0 2 1980 5–12 29.4% 1,579 0 1
1980 6–10 37.5% 1,613 0 2 1981 6–10 37.5% 1,583 0 1
1981 21–10 67.7% 1,723 0 5 1982 10–17 37.0% 1,618 0 1
1982 26–22 54.2% 1,791 0 5 1983 15–15 50.0% 1,673 0 1
1983 11–22 33.3% 1,608 0 6 1984 4–9 30.8% 1,641 0 1
1984 2–6 25.0% 1,550 0 6 1985 11–9 55.0% 1,704 0 1
1985 2–2 50.0% 1,578 0 6
1986 0–2 0.0% 1,558 0 6
1987 0–1 0.0% 1,543 0 6
1988 0–1 0.0% 1,526 0 6

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Sabina Simmonds Petra Delhees Jauch
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1974 0 2 2 0.0% 1975 0 1 1 0.0%
1975 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1976 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1977 0 1 1 0.0%
1977 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1978 5 2 7 71.4% 1 3 4 25.0%
1978 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
1979 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
1980 2 1 3 66.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1981 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
1981 10 7 17 58.8% 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0%
1982 6 5 11 54.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 8 17 52.9% 1983 6 5 11 54.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1983 3 4 7 42.9% 5 7 12 41.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 8 8 0.0% 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
1984 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 1 2 3 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8%
1985 1 1 2 50.0%
1986 0 2 2 0.0%
1987 0 1 1 0.0%
1988 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 13 18 31 41.9% 43 55 98 43.9% 13 20 33 39.4% 14 19 33 42.4% Career 12 14 26 46.2% 37 46 83 44.6% 6 16 22 27.3% 8 13 21 38.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Sabina Simmonds Petra Delhees Jauch
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1974 1476 93.7 0.0% -3.75 +0.28 1975 1484 96.6 0.0% -3.00 +0.26
1975 1470 104.3 +49 46.7% -0.27 0–3 (0%) 1–0 +0.28 1976 1467 98.7 0.0% -3.67 -0.17
1976 1526 120.4 +53 +36 44.8% -0.41 2–3 (40%) 1–0 +0.28 1977 1450 96.1 0.0% -3.50 +0.42
1977 1526 117.1 +70 32.0% -1.68 1–2 (33%) 2–0 -0.63 1978 1533 116.6 +53 -9 39.1% -0.96 2–1 (67%) 1–1 +0.07
1978 1610 123.2 -6 +1 -98 52.4% +0.14 2–7 (22%) 2–0 +1.86 1979 1652 121.1 -19 -54 -125 54.8% +0.14 5–1 (83%) 1–2 (33%) +0.87
1979 1670 120.9 -33 -8 -127 57.4% +0.19 3–1 (75%) 5–1 (83%) 104.8 +3.43 1980 1580 121.7 -25 -12 35.9% -0.79 1–4 (20%) 1–4 (20%) 94.8 +1.16
1980 1613 118.9 -2 -80 -124 47.1% +0.23 0–4 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 94.0 +0.67 1981 1584 118.5 +12 -38 42.1% -0.21 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.4 +0.74
1981 1723 130.1 -50 66.2% +1.58 6–3 (67%) 2–5 (29%) 102.7 +3.30 1982 1619 133.1 -48 -27 -57 41.7% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 4–1 (80%) 99.1 -2.23
1982 1791 140.8 -56 -86 -193 55.7% +0.48 5–7 (42%) 5–3 (63%) 100.9 -1.87 1983 1673 122.9 -58 +21 48.5% -0.05 4–2 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 101.7 +0.98
1983 1608 110.1 -21 +69 +13 38.5% -0.99 4–10 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 92.3 +1.88 1984 1641 109.6 -12 -25 36.7% -1.13 1–3 (25%) 1–0 -0.15
1984 1551 99.0 -13 29.4% -1.23 0–1 1–3 (25%) +0.79 1985 1705 132.4 -86 +6 56.5% +0.17 2–4 (33%) 1–1 -1.26
1985 1578 117.8 50.0% -0.50 -0.84
1986 1558 98.2 20.0% -3.00 0–1 1–0 -0.13
1987 1544 99.5 0.0% -2.50 +0.09
1988 1527 93.7 0.0% -5.00 +0.15
Career 1830 128.7 -36 -3 -91 49.3% -0.05 23–42 (35%) 25–19 (57%) 95.8 +4.20 Career 1719 129.5 -42 +2 -58 44.1% -0.47 18–24 (43%) 12–16 (43%) 99.0 +0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.