H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sabine Appelmans vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 2-2
Sabine Appelmans and Catarina Lindqvist Ryan are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Sabine Appelmans leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sabine Appelmans won the 1992 Pattaya quarterfinal 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 54
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 1992* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Sabine Appelmans | 6-2 6-4 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Feb 10, 1991* | Oslo | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-2 6-2 | Sabine Appelmans | Match data |
| Aug 29, 1990* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Sabine Appelmans | 6-4 6-7(6) 6-4 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Apr 14, 1990* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 7-5 6-2 | Sabine Appelmans | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine Appelmans | #94 | #16 | 1,502 | 1,923 | 279 | 202 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sabine Appelmans | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #196 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #144 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #22 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #18 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #26 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 1993 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #36 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 1994 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #27 | 1,821 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 1995 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #31 | 1,809 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 |
| 1996 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #16 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 1998 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #48 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 |
| 1999 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 2000 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,685 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |