H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sabine Appelmans vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 1-0
Sabine Appelmans holds a 1–0 lead over Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sabine Appelmans leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sabine Appelmans won the 1992 Berlin third round 7-6 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 54
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 1992* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Sabine Appelmans | 7-6 4-6 6-4 | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine Appelmans | #94 | #16 | 1,502 | 1,923 | 279 | 202 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sabine Appelmans | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 15 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #196 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #144 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1990 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #22 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1991 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #18 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #26 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1993 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #36 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1994 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #27 | 1,821 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1995 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #31 | 1,809 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1996 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #16 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1998 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #48 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1999 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2000 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,685 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |