H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Sabine Appelmans vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 0-2

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 2–0 lead over Sabine Appelmans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1995 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sabine Appelmans
BEL Age 54 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 28, 1995* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Kimiko Date Krumm 6-4 6-2 Sabine Appelmans #30 Match data
Apr 12, 1992* Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 F Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 7-5 3-6 6-3 Sabine Appelmans #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sabine Appelmans #94 #16 1,502 1,923 279 202 58.0% 0 0 0 2 5 7
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sabine Appelmans Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 1–1 50.0% #283 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 1–3 25.0% #196 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1989 2–5 28.6% #144 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1990 21–12 63.6% #22 1,679 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1991 34–14 70.8% #18 1,873 0 2 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1992 26–15 63.4% #26 1,875 0 3 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1993 19–15 55.9% #36 1,828 0 3 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1994 29–16 64.4% #27 1,821 0 5 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 1995 24–17 58.5% #31 1,809 0 6 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 1996 26–16 61.9% #21 1,843 0 7 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 1997 37–26 58.7% #16 1,856 0 7 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 1998 13–18 41.9% #48 1,721 0 7 — — — — — — —
27 1999 25–21 54.3% #30 1,777 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 2000 20–22 47.6% #49 1,692 0 7 — — — — — — —
29 2001 1–1 50.0% #94 1,685 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8