H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sabine Appelmans vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 0-2
Leila Meskhi holds a 2–0 lead over Sabine Appelmans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Leila Meskhi leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1992 San Diego third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 54
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GEO
Age 58
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1992* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Leila Meskhi | 6-4 6-1 | Sabine Appelmans | Match data |
| Feb 4, 1990* | Auckland | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Leila Meskhi | 6-1 6-0 | Sabine Appelmans | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine Appelmans | #94 | #16 | 1,502 | 1,923 | 279 | 202 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Leila Meskhi | #903 | #12 | 72 | 2,001 | 192 | 119 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sabine Appelmans | Leila Meskhi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #196 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #144 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #22 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #18 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #46 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #26 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #36 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #27 | 1,821 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #19 | 1,928 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1995 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #31 | 1,809 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1996 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #16 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1998 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #48 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1999 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2000 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #838 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,685 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |