Sabine Appelmans
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Coetzer | 2 | 5 | 7 | Sep 25, 2000 | H2H |
| Anke Huber | 2 | 5 | 7 | May 4, 2000 | H2H |
| Irina Spirlea | 5 | 2 | 7 | Sep 23, 1999 | H2H |
| Mary Pierce | 0 | 7 | 7 | Sep 7, 1999 | H2H |
| Dominique Monami | 0 | 7 | 7 | Jun 18, 1999 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Leila Meskhi holds a 2–0 lead over Sabine Appelmans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Leila Meskhi leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1992 San Diego round of 32 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leila Meskhi | 6-4 6-1 | Sabine Appelmans | Match data | Aug 27, 1992* | R32 | San Diego | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Carpet |
| Leila Meskhi | 6-1 6-0 | Sabine Appelmans | Match data | Feb 4, 1990* | F | ASB Classic | Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine Appelmans | #94 | #16 | 1,502 | 1,925 | 284 | 205 | 58.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Leila Meskhi | #903 | #12 | 72 | 1,987 | 193 | 121 | 61.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sabine Appelmans | Leila Meskhi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #196 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #144 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #22 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #18 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #46 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #26 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #36 | 1,834 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #27 | 1,821 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #19 | 1,928 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1995 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #31 | 1,809 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,936 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1996 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #21 | 1,832 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #22 | 1,928 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #16 | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,871 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1998 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #48 | 1,722 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #34 | 1,842 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1999 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #30 | 1,778 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,832 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #49 | 1,697 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #838 | 1,746 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,689 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Sabine Appelmans | Leila Meskhi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 1987 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 26 | 8 | 34 | 76.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1987 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 20 | 1992 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1988 | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 21 | 1993 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1989 | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 22 | 1994 | 19 | 9 | 28 | 67.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 1990 | 19 | 5 | 24 | 79.2% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100.0% |
| 23 | 1995 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1991 | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| 24 | 1996 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 1992 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| 25 | 1997 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 1993 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 26 | 1998 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 1994 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 27 | 1999 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1995 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2000 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1996 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 29 | 2001 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 139 | 90 | 229 | 60.7% | 54 | 49 | 103 | 52.4% | 22 | 17 | 39 | 56.4% | 69 | 49 | 118 | 58.5% | — | 101 | 58 | 159 | 63.5% | 64 | 39 | 103 | 62.1% | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 25 | 16 | 41 | 61.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Sabine Appelmans | Leila Meskhi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1987 | 1502 | 99.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.17 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 1498 | 106.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +40 | — | 30.0% | -1.10 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 1468 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | +65 | +26 | — | 31.3% | -0.50 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 1679 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | +19 | -159 | — | 59.2% | +0.76 | 7–3 (70%) | 1–4 (20%) | 103.2 | +2.93 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 1873 | 150.3 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -285 | — | 69.9% | +1.36 | 5–4 (56%) | 1–0 | — | +1.14 | 1987 | 1656 | 134.5 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -63 | — | 64.1% | +1.05 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–1 | — | +0.80 |
| 20 | 1992 | 1896 | 145.1 | — | — | — | — | +3 | -146 | — | 61.0% | +0.64 | 7–3 (70%) | 2–3 (40%) | 104.4 | -0.44 | 1988 | 1696 | 129.7 | — | — | — | — | +32 | — | -166 | 49.4% | -0.23 | 8–5 (62%) | 3–6 (33%) | 102.3 | +0.65 |
| 21 | 1993 | 1835 | 135.0 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -112 | -193 | 53.1% | +0.44 | 8–5 (62%) | 2–5 (29%) | 98.4 | +0.40 | 1989 | 1795 | 139.4 | — | — | — | — | +11 | -135 | — | 59.2% | +0.57 | 3–3 (50%) | 8–0 (100%) | 108.0 | -1.90 |
| 22 | 1994 | 1822 | 144.0 | — | — | — | — | +46 | -108 | — | 58.0% | +0.80 | 10–2 (83%) | 5–4 (56%) | 106.6 | +0.26 | 1990 | 1928 | 151.0 | — | — | — | — | +5 | -112 | -373 | 66.4% | +1.63 | 10–3 (77%) | 3–6 (33%) | 102.3 | +1.11 |
| 23 | 1995 | 1809 | 140.0 | — | — | — | — | -2 | -18 | — | 57.6% | +0.37 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–1 (80%) | 99.8 | -0.91 | 1991 | 1937 | 151.3 | — | — | — | — | -20 | +20 | — | 62.6% | +0.74 | 9–4 (69%) | 5–5 (50%) | 105.3 | +0.25 |
| 24 | 1996 | 1833 | 145.6 | — | — | — | — | -10 | -70 | -165 | 62.1% | +0.81 | 4–7 (36%) | 3–4 (43%) | 95.3 | +0.59 | 1992 | 1928 | 157.9 | — | — | — | — | -26 | +60 | — | 61.5% | +1.16 | 7–4 (64%) | 3–8 (27%) | 96.9 | -1.71 |
| 25 | 1997 | 1855 | 155.7 | — | — | — | — | -46 | -8 | -89 | 58.7% | +0.54 | 9–14 (39%) | 4–7 (36%) | 93.5 | -1.41 | 1993 | 1872 | 148.4 | — | — | — | — | -2 | +90 | — | 55.3% | +0.05 | 4–3 (57%) | 2–2 (50%) | 100.4 | -1.93 |
| 26 | 1998 | 1722 | 138.4 | — | — | — | — | +60 | +2 | +76 | 47.1% | -0.26 | 1–9 (10%) | 3–3 (50%) | 89.5 | -0.30 | 1994 | 1843 | 148.6 | — | — | — | — | -3 | +108 | — | 55.2% | +0.72 | 9–4 (69%) | 3–3 (50%) | 102.8 | +0.52 |
| 27 | 1999 | 1778 | 137.2 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -92 | -38 | 56.3% | +0.48 | 5–8 (38%) | 7–9 (44%) | 95.0 | -0.07 | 1995 | 1833 | 120.0 | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 73.3% | +1.87 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | 98.8 | +0.23 |
| 28 | 2000 | 1697 | 139.6 | — | — | — | — | +36 | -31 | +95 | 48.5% | -0.15 | 7–6 (54%) | 7–6 (54%) | 100.1 | -0.37 | 1996 | 1747 | 89.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.63 | — | — | — | -0.21 |
| 29 | 2001 | 1689 | 101.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.50 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1925 | 148.8 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -69 | -45 | 57.1% | +0.51 | 71–69 (51%) | 40–49 (45%) | 95.3 | +0.71 | — | 1987 | 152.8 | — | — | — | — | +2 | 0 | -270 | 58.9% | +0.70 | 52–30 (63%) | 28–33 (46%) | 103.7 | -0.70 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Coetzer | 2 | 5 | 7 | Sep 25, 2000 | H2H |
| Anke Huber | 2 | 5 | 7 | May 4, 2000 | H2H |
| Irina Spirlea | 5 | 2 | 7 | Sep 23, 1999 | H2H |
| Mary Pierce | 0 | 7 | 7 | Sep 7, 1999 | H2H |
| Dominique Monami | 0 | 7 | 7 | Jun 18, 1999 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 0 | 9 | 9 | Apr 30, 1994 | H2H |
| Natasha Zvereva | 3 | 5 | 8 | Aug 19, 1993 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 0 | 6 | 6 | Oct 14, 1994 | H2H |
| Anke Huber | 3 | 3 | 6 | Sep 1, 1994 | H2H |
| Katerina Maleeva | 4 | 2 | 6 | Apr 29, 1994 | H2H |