H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Sabine Appelmans vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 2-1

Sabine Appelmans holds a 2–1 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sabine Appelmans leads 2–0 on carpet, while Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sabine Appelmans won the 1996 Essen third round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sabine Appelmans
BEL Age 54 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 22, 1996* Essen WTA 250 R32 Carpet Sabine Appelmans #27 6-2 6-3 Lori Mcneil #42 Match data
Oct 4, 1991* Milan WTA 250 R16 Carpet Sabine Appelmans #28 6-3 6-2 Lori Mcneil #19 Match data
Apr 14, 1991* Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 F Hard Lori Mcneil #36 2-6 6-2 6-1 Sabine Appelmans #25 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sabine Appelmans #94 #16 1,502 1,923 279 202 58.0% 0 0 0 2 5 7
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sabine Appelmans Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 1–1 50.0% #283 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 1–3 25.0% #196 1,498 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1989 2–5 28.6% #144 1,468 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1990 21–12 63.6% #22 1,679 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1991 34–14 70.8% #18 1,873 0 2 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1992 26–15 63.4% #26 1,875 0 3 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1993 19–15 55.9% #36 1,828 0 3 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1994 29–16 64.4% #27 1,821 0 5 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1995 24–17 58.5% #31 1,809 0 6 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1996 26–16 61.9% #21 1,843 0 7 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 1997 37–26 58.7% #16 1,856 0 7 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1998 13–18 41.9% #48 1,721 0 7 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 1999 25–21 54.3% #30 1,777 0 7 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 2000 20–22 47.6% #49 1,692 0 7 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 2001 1–1 50.0% #94 1,685 0 7 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11