H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sabine Appelmans vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 2-1

Sabine Appelmans holds a 2–1 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sabine Appelmans leads 2–0 on carpet, while Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sabine Appelmans won the 1996 Essen round of 32 6-2 6-3.

BEL Age 54 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 1
3 main-draw meetings
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sabine Appelmans #27 6-2 6-3 Lori Mcneil #42 Match data Feb 22, 1996* R32 Essen Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Sabine Appelmans #28 6-3 6-2 Lori Mcneil #19 Match data Oct 4, 1991* R16 Milan Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Lori Mcneil #36 2-6 6-2 6-1 Sabine Appelmans #25 Match data Apr 14, 1991* F Tokyo Japan Open Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sabine Appelmans #94 #16 1,502 1,925 284 205 58.1% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sabine Appelmans Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 1–1 50.0% #283 1,502 0 0
16 1988 1–3 25.0% #196 1,498 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0
17 1989 2–5 28.6% #144 1,467 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% 1,520 0 1
18 1990 21–12 63.6% #22 1,679 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% 1,503 0 1
19 1991 34–14 70.8% #18 1,873 0 2 1983 6–5 54.5% 1,568 0 1
20 1992 29–16 64.4% #26 1,895 0 3 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1
21 1993 19–15 55.9% #36 1,834 0 3 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1994 29–16 64.4% #27 1,821 0 5 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1995 24–17 58.5% #31 1,809 0 6 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3
24 1996 26–17 60.5% #21 1,832 0 7 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5
25 1997 37–26 58.7% #16 1,855 0 7 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1998 13–18 41.9% #48 1,722 0 7 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6
27 1999 25–21 54.3% #30 1,778 0 7 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 2000 22–23 48.9% #49 1,697 0 7 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 2001 1–1 50.0% #94 1,689 0 7 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,670 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sabine Appelmans Lori Mcneil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1987 1 1 2 50.0%
16 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
17 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
18 1990 15 6 21 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1982 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1991 26 8 34 76.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1983 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1993 7 8 15 46.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1994 19 9 28 67.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1%
23 1995 10 8 18 55.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4%
24 1996 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 12 4 16 75.0% 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 1997 12 10 22 54.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 9 9 18 50.0% 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
26 1998 1 4 5 20.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1999 11 8 19 57.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 2000 13 12 25 52.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7%
29 2001 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6%
31 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
32 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
34 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
35 1999 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 139 90 229 60.7% 54 49 103 52.4% 22 17 39 56.4% 69 49 118 58.5% 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sabine Appelmans Lori Mcneil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1987 1502 99.4 50.0% -0.17 1–1 +0.44
16 1988 1498 106.4 +40 30.0% -1.10 1–1 0–1 +0.03 1980 1485 95.1 0.0% -4.50 +0.17
17 1989 1468 98.3 +65 +26 31.3% -0.50 1–1 0–2 +0.98 1981 1521 104.9 100.0% +4.50 +0.24
18 1990 1679 133.0 +19 -159 59.2% +0.76 7–3 (70%) 1–4 (20%) 103.2 +2.93 1982 1503 100.0 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 +0.35
19 1991 1873 150.3 +27 -285 69.9% +1.36 5–4 (56%) 1–0 +1.14 1983 1569 107.1 +44 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 +1.06
20 1992 1896 145.1 +3 -146 61.0% +0.64 7–3 (70%) 2–3 (40%) 104.4 -0.44 1984 1608 115.2 +12 -54 +10 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 +0.27
21 1993 1835 135.0 +9 -112 -193 53.1% +0.44 8–5 (62%) 2–5 (29%) 98.4 +0.40 1985 1587 118.3 +22 -103 +5 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.20
22 1994 1822 144.0 +46 -108 58.0% +0.80 10–2 (83%) 5–4 (56%) 106.6 +0.26 1986 1884 144.9 -9 -341 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.49
23 1995 1809 140.0 -2 -18 57.6% +0.37 5–5 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 99.8 -0.91 1987 2007 158.4 +54 -355 -205 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.78
24 1996 1833 145.6 -10 -70 -165 62.1% +0.81 4–7 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 95.3 +0.59 1988 1901 142.6 +37 -185 +39 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +2.06
25 1997 1855 155.7 -46 -8 -89 58.7% +0.54 9–14 (39%) 4–7 (36%) 93.5 -1.41 1989 1760 134.7 +60 -78 +79 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.23
26 1998 1722 138.4 +60 +2 +76 47.1% -0.26 1–9 (10%) 3–3 (50%) 89.5 -0.30 1990 1695 134.9 +14 -74 +200 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80
27 1999 1778 137.2 +27 -92 -38 56.3% +0.48 5–8 (38%) 7–9 (44%) 95.0 -0.07 1991 1870 151.0 +12 -241 +42 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74
28 2000 1697 139.6 +36 -31 +95 48.5% -0.15 7–6 (54%) 7–6 (54%) 100.1 -0.37 1992 1962 156.8 -4 -303 +76 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46
29 2001 1689 101.4 50.0% -0.50 1–0 +0.19 1993 1899 147.7 -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38
30 1994 1871 145.9 -58 -207 +244 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52
31 1995 1805 142.2 -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26
32 1996 1727 130.2 -12 +384 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48
33 1997 1656 120.2 +31 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 -1.12
34 1998 1719 129.4 +1 -154 +315 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 -0.58
35 1999 1671 99.0 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 +0.18
Career 1925 148.8 +14 -69 -45 57.1% +0.51 71–69 (51%) 40–49 (45%) 95.3 +0.71 2025 149.2 +14 -212 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.