H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sabine Appelmans vs Natalia Baudone H2H: 2-1
Sabine Appelmans holds a 2–1 lead over Natalia Baudone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sabine Appelmans leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sabine Appelmans won the 1996 Australian Open first round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 54
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 1996* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Sabine Appelmans | 7-5 6-4 | Natalia Baudone | Match data |
| Apr 7, 1994* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sabine Appelmans | 6-2 6-4 | Natalia Baudone | Match data |
| Jan 5, 1994* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Natalia Baudone | 7-5 6-3 | Sabine Appelmans | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine Appelmans | #94 | #16 | 1,502 | 1,923 | 279 | 202 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Natalia Baudone | #934 | #71 | 126 | 1,682 | 38 | 58 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sabine Appelmans | Natalia Baudone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #224 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #196 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #144 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #101 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #22 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #18 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #96 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #26 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #36 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #27 | 1,821 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #31 | 1,809 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #16 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #48 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,685 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |