Sabine Appelmans
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Coetzer | 2 | 5 | 7 | Sep 25, 2000 | H2H |
| Anke Huber | 2 | 5 | 7 | May 4, 2000 | H2H |
| Irina Spirlea | 5 | 2 | 7 | Sep 23, 1999 | H2H |
| Mary Pierce | 0 | 7 | 7 | Sep 7, 1999 | H2H |
| Dominique Monami | 0 | 7 | 7 | Jun 18, 1999 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Natasha Zvereva holds a 5–0 lead over Sabine Appelmans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Natasha Zvereva leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1998 Australian Open round of 128 2-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natasha Zvereva | 2-6 6-2 6-3 | Sabine Appelmans | Match data | Jan 21, 1998* | R128 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Natasha Zvereva | 7-5 6-3 | Sabine Appelmans | Match data | Jul 26, 1996* | R64 | Atlanta Olympics | Olympics | Hard |
| Natasha Zvereva | 6-3 6-4 | Sabine Appelmans | Match data | Jun 27, 1993* | R32 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Natasha Zvereva | 6-1 7-6(1) | Sabine Appelmans | Match data | May 28, 1992* | R64 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
| Natasha Zvereva | 6-4 6-2 | Sabine Appelmans | Match data | Nov 14, 1991* | R32 | Philadelphia | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine Appelmans | #94 | #16 | 1,502 | 1,925 | 284 | 205 | 58.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Natasha Zvereva | #201 | #5 | 1,820 | 2,074 | 394 | 236 | 62.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sabine Appelmans | Natasha Zvereva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #94 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #196 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #19 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #144 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 40–18 | 69.0% | #7 | 1,997 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #22 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #27 | 1,804 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #18 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,953 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1992 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #26 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #21 | 1,912 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1993 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #36 | 1,834 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #23 | 1,981 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1994 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #27 | 1,821 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #19 | 1,973 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1995 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #31 | 1,809 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 1,979 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1996 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #21 | 1,832 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #14 | 1,970 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #16 | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,897 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1998 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #48 | 1,722 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,907 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1999 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #30 | 1,778 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #49 | 1,697 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #27 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,689 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #78 | 1,733 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Sabine Appelmans | Natasha Zvereva | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 1987 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% |
| 16 | 1988 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% |
| 17 | 1989 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% |
| 18 | 1990 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1989 | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 19 | 1991 | 26 | 8 | 34 | 76.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1990 | 15 | 3 | 18 | 83.3% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 20 | 1992 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1991 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 21 | 1993 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1992 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% |
| 22 | 1994 | 19 | 9 | 28 | 67.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 1993 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% |
| 23 | 1995 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1994 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% |
| 24 | 1996 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 1995 | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 25 | 1997 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 1996 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 1998 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 1997 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 1999 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1998 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 28 | 2000 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1999 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 29 | 2001 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 139 | 90 | 229 | 60.7% | 54 | 49 | 103 | 52.4% | 22 | 17 | 39 | 56.4% | 69 | 49 | 118 | 58.5% | — | 157 | 98 | 255 | 61.6% | 98 | 56 | 154 | 63.6% | 71 | 31 | 102 | 69.6% | 68 | 51 | 119 | 57.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Sabine Appelmans | Natasha Zvereva | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1987 | 1502 | 99.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.17 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.44 | 1986 | 1575 | 112.4 | — | — | — | — | +63 | — | — | 56.3% | -0.12 | 3–1 (75%) | 2–0 | — | +0.85 |
| 16 | 1988 | 1498 | 106.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +40 | — | 30.0% | -1.10 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.03 | 1987 | 1836 | 140.5 | — | — | — | — | -21 | -249 | -181 | 63.8% | +0.70 | 5–4 (56%) | 4–2 (67%) | — | +0.51 |
| 17 | 1989 | 1468 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | +65 | +26 | — | 31.3% | -0.50 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.98 | 1988 | 1997 | 161.2 | — | — | — | — | -75 | -213 | -183 | 66.7% | +1.05 | 7–6 (54%) | 8–4 (67%) | — | -3.11 |
| 18 | 1990 | 1679 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | +19 | -159 | — | 59.2% | +0.76 | 7–3 (70%) | 1–4 (20%) | — | +2.93 | 1989 | 1805 | 144.1 | — | — | — | — | +20 | -25 | -21 | 57.3% | +0.91 | 4–5 (44%) | 2–7 (22%) | — | -0.26 |
| 19 | 1991 | 1873 | 150.3 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -285 | — | 69.9% | +1.36 | 5–4 (56%) | 1–0 | — | +1.14 | 1990 | 1953 | 156.8 | — | — | — | — | -78 | -41 | -36 | 65.8% | +1.03 | 10–5 (67%) | 6–4 (60%) | — | -0.92 |
| 20 | 1992 | 1896 | 145.1 | — | — | — | — | +3 | -146 | — | 61.0% | +0.64 | 7–3 (70%) | 2–3 (40%) | — | -0.44 | 1991 | 1912 | 148.8 | — | — | — | — | -66 | +41 | +34 | 59.2% | +0.55 | 6–3 (67%) | 10–5 (67%) | — | -0.24 |
| 21 | 1993 | 1835 | 135.0 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -112 | -193 | 53.1% | +0.44 | 8–5 (62%) | 2–5 (29%) | — | +0.40 | 1992 | 1982 | 158.3 | — | — | — | — | -114 | +58 | +53 | 61.3% | +0.90 | 6–5 (55%) | 8–6 (57%) | — | -2.82 |
| 22 | 1994 | 1822 | 144.0 | — | — | — | — | +46 | -108 | — | 58.0% | +0.80 | 10–2 (83%) | 5–4 (56%) | — | +0.26 | 1993 | 1974 | 157.3 | — | — | — | — | -22 | -9 | +90 | 65.3% | +0.98 | 7–3 (70%) | 8–4 (67%) | — | +0.50 |
| 23 | 1995 | 1809 | 140.0 | — | — | — | — | -2 | -18 | — | 57.6% | +0.37 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–1 (80%) | — | -0.91 | 1994 | 1979 | 161.7 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -6 | +1 | 69.6% | +1.40 | 6–6 (50%) | 7–3 (70%) | — | -1.08 |
| 24 | 1996 | 1833 | 145.6 | — | — | — | — | -10 | -70 | -165 | 62.1% | +0.81 | 4–7 (36%) | 3–4 (43%) | — | +0.59 | 1995 | 1971 | 161.0 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -3 | +16 | 59.5% | +0.80 | 13–7 (65%) | 6–6 (50%) | — | -0.19 |
| 25 | 1997 | 1855 | 155.7 | — | — | — | — | -46 | -8 | -89 | 58.7% | +0.54 | 9–14 (39%) | 4–7 (36%) | — | -1.41 | 1996 | 1897 | 147.8 | — | — | — | — | +45 | +39 | +91 | 50.0% | -0.02 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–4 (20%) | — | -1.77 |
| 26 | 1998 | 1722 | 138.4 | — | — | — | — | +60 | +2 | +76 | 47.1% | -0.26 | 1–9 (10%) | 3–3 (50%) | — | -0.30 | 1997 | 1907 | 154.8 | — | — | — | — | +11 | +5 | +82 | 56.3% | +0.19 | 8–4 (67%) | 8–3 (73%) | — | -3.07 |
| 27 | 1999 | 1778 | 137.2 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -92 | -38 | 56.3% | +0.48 | 5–8 (38%) | 7–9 (44%) | — | -0.07 | 1998 | 1934 | 156.7 | — | — | — | — | -36 | -9 | +187 | 60.5% | +0.47 | 7–5 (58%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | -3.30 |
| 28 | 2000 | 1697 | 139.6 | — | — | — | — | +36 | -31 | +95 | 48.5% | -0.15 | 7–6 (54%) | 7–6 (54%) | — | -0.37 | 1999 | 1825 | 141.3 | — | — | — | — | +2 | 0 | +268 | 54.8% | +0.40 | 8–3 (73%) | 3–7 (30%) | — | -0.76 |
| 29 | 2001 | 1689 | 101.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.50 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.19 | 2000 | 1733 | 128.2 | — | — | — | — | +39 | +59 | +392 | 42.0% | -0.66 | 5–1 (83%) | 0–2 | — | -0.52 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1708 | 97.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.15 |
| Career | — | 1925 | 148.8 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -69 | -45 | 57.1% | +0.51 | 71–69 (51%) | 40–49 (45%) | 95.3 | +0.71 | — | 2074 | 160.7 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -15 | +55 | 60.5% | +0.69 | 97–63 (61%) | 77–61 (56%) | 107.9 | -2.55 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Coetzer | 2 | 5 | 7 | Sep 25, 2000 | H2H |
| Anke Huber | 2 | 5 | 7 | May 4, 2000 | H2H |
| Irina Spirlea | 5 | 2 | 7 | Sep 23, 1999 | H2H |
| Mary Pierce | 0 | 7 | 7 | Sep 7, 1999 | H2H |
| Dominique Monami | 0 | 7 | 7 | Jun 18, 1999 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steffi Graf | 1 | 20 | 21 | Mar 22, 1999 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 5 | 8 | 13 | Oct 16, 1993 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 7 | 5 | 12 | Feb 4, 2000 | H2H |
| Nathalie Tauziat | 6 | 6 | 12 | Jun 20, 1999 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 4 | 8 | 12 | Oct 9, 1997 | H2H |