H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sabine Appelmans vs Samantha Reeves H2H: 1-0
Sabine Appelmans holds a 1–0 lead over Samantha Reeves in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sabine Appelmans leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sabine Appelmans won the 1999 US Open second round 6-4 6-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 54
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Sabine Appelmans | 6-4 6-7 6-3 | Samantha Reeves | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine Appelmans | #94 | #16 | 1,502 | 1,923 | 279 | 202 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Samantha Reeves | #864 | #62 | 523 | 1,629 | 30 | 59 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sabine Appelmans | Samantha Reeves | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #196 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #144 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #22 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #18 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #111 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #26 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #36 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #171 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #27 | 1,821 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #106 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #31 | 1,809 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #74 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #16 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #198 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #48 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1999 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2000 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,685 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |