H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Sabine Appelmans vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 1-2

Sandra Cecchini holds a 2–1 lead over Sabine Appelmans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Sandra Cecchini leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sabine Appelmans won the 1995 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sabine Appelmans
BEL Age 54 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 31, 1995* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Sabine Appelmans #37 6-3 6-4 Sandra Cecchini #36 Match data
Sep 24, 1994* Moscow WTA 500 SF Carpet Sandra Cecchini #47 7-5 6-3 Sabine Appelmans #22 Match data
Jul 14, 1990* Bastad WTA 250 QF Clay Sandra Cecchini #26 6-3 3-6 7-5 Sabine Appelmans #41 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sabine Appelmans #94 #16 1,502 1,923 279 202 58.0% 0 0 0 2 5 7
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sabine Appelmans Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 1–1 50.0% #283 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 1–3 25.0% #196 1,498 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1989 2–5 28.6% #144 1,468 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1990 21–12 63.6% #22 1,679 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1991 34–14 70.8% #18 1,873 0 2 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1992 26–15 63.4% #26 1,875 0 3 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1993 19–15 55.9% #36 1,828 0 3 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1994 29–16 64.4% #27 1,821 0 5 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1995 24–17 58.5% #31 1,809 0 6 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1996 26–16 61.9% #21 1,843 0 7 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1997 37–26 58.7% #16 1,856 0 7 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 1998 13–18 41.9% #48 1,721 0 7 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 1999 25–21 54.3% #30 1,777 0 7 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 2000 20–22 47.6% #49 1,692 0 7 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 2001 1–1 50.0% #94 1,685 0 7 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11