H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sabine Appelmans vs Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor H2H: 1-2
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor holds a 2–1 lead over Sabine Appelmans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor won the 1998 Rome second round 6-1 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 54
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 1998* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Sabine Appelmans | Match data |
| Feb 13, 1998* | Paris | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | 5-7 6-3 6-1 | Sabine Appelmans | Match data |
| Nov 1, 1996* | Kremlin Cup | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Sabine Appelmans | 6-4 7-6 | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine Appelmans | #94 | #16 | 1,502 | 1,923 | 279 | 202 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | #739 | #29 | 917 | 1,771 | 109 | 123 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sabine Appelmans | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #196 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #144 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #22 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #122 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #18 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #94 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #26 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #36 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #57 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #27 | 1,821 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #31 | 1,809 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #36 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1996 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #16 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #160 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1998 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #48 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1999 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2000 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,685 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |