H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sabine Appelmans vs Zina Garrison H2H: 1-3
Zina Garrison holds a 3–1 lead over Sabine Appelmans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1994 Sydney fourth round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 54
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 1994* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Zina Garrison | 7-5 7-5 | Sabine Appelmans | Match data |
| Oct 24, 1993* | Budapest | WTA 250 | F | Carpet | Zina Garrison | 7-5 6-2 | Sabine Appelmans | Match data |
| Jan 14, 1993* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Sabine Appelmans | 6-4 7-6 | Zina Garrison | Match data |
| Aug 28, 1991* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Zina Garrison | 7-5 6-4 | Sabine Appelmans | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine Appelmans | #94 | #16 | 1,502 | 1,923 | 279 | 202 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Zina Garrison | #318 | #4 | 134 | 2,142 | 581 | 268 | 68.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sabine Appelmans | Zina Garrison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #196 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #144 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1990 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #22 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1991 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #18 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #26 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #9 | 2,012 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1993 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #36 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #8 | 2,032 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1994 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #27 | 1,821 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,999 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1995 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #31 | 1,809 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1996 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,021 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #16 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,130 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1998 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #48 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 2,039 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1999 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,963 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 2000 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #18 | 1,924 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,685 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,995 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #22 | 1,868 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #273 | 1,704 | 0 | 15 |