H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sabine Hack vs Catherine Mothes Jobkel H2H: 1-0
Sabine Hack holds a 1–0 lead over Catherine Mothes Jobkel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sabine Hack leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sabine Hack won the 1990 Estoril quarterfinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 1990* | Estoril | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Sabine Hack | 6-3 6-3 | Catherine Mothes Jobkel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine Hack | #523 | #13 | 577 | 1,996 | 180 | 135 | 57.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Catherine Mothes Jobkel | — | — | — | 1,605 | 22 | 32 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sabine Hack | Catherine Mothes Jobkel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1985 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1986 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #262 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #146 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #45 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #59 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #35 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #24 | 1,854 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #40 | 1,729 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,706 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #523 | 1,648 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |