H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC
Sabine Hack holds a 1–0 lead over Themis Zambrzycki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sabine Hack leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sabine Hack won the 1990 Key Biscayne round of 128 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine Hack | 6-2 7-5 | Themis Zambrzycki | Match data | Mar 17, 1990* | R128 | Key Biscayne | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine Hack | #523 | #13 | 577 | 1,997 | 180 | 135 | 57.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Themis Zambrzycki | — | — | — | 1,500 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sabine Hack | Themis Zambrzycki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1985 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1986 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #262 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #146 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1990 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #45 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #59 | 1,677 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1992 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #35 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1993 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #24 | 1,854 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1994 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1995 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #40 | 1,729 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1996 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,706 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #523 | 1,648 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Sabine Hack | Themis Zambrzycki | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1985 | 1559 | 112.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 83.3% | +2.42 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1986 | 1524 | 94.5 | — | — | — | — | — | -21 | — | 31.3% | -1.56 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 1520 | 105.2 | — | — | — | — | — | -26 | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 1561 | 103.4 | — | — | — | — | — | -20 | — | 47.6% | +0.09 | 3–0 (100%) | 0–1 | — | +1.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 1593 | 127.3 | — | — | — | — | -74 | +23 | — | 49.0% | +0.43 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–3 (40%) | 99.2 | +1.67 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1990 | 1626 | 127.7 | — | — | — | — | -106 | +62 | — | 59.1% | +0.62 | 1–7 (13%) | 2–2 (50%) | 92.0 | +1.79 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1991 | 1678 | 129.4 | — | — | — | — | -149 | +100 | — | 59.0% | +0.72 | 1–4 (20%) | 4–0 (100%) | 100.1 | +1.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1992 | 1777 | 140.5 | — | — | — | — | -143 | +86 | — | 57.9% | +0.38 | 4–2 (67%) | 2–3 (40%) | 103.6 | -0.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1993 | 1855 | 149.1 | — | — | — | — | -246 | +134 | — | 62.5% | +1.13 | 6–6 (50%) | 6–2 (75%) | 102.9 | +0.76 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1994 | 1832 | 155.9 | — | — | — | — | -190 | +246 | — | 60.4% | +0.86 | 8–5 (62%) | 4–7 (36%) | 101.9 | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1995 | 1730 | 134.7 | — | — | — | — | -114 | +234 | — | 55.0% | +0.44 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–3 (40%) | 96.1 | +0.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1996 | 1706 | 138.2 | — | — | — | — | -80 | +168 | — | 55.6% | +0.71 | 4–4 (50%) | 0–4 (0%) | 96.8 | -0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1997 | 1648 | 95.6 | — | — | — | — | -64 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.89 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1468 | 94.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.80 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.49 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1444 | 91.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.15 |
| Career | — | 1998 | 143.8 | — | — | — | — | -144 | +125 | — | 56.9% | +0.61 | 34–37 (48%) | 24–26 (48%) | 99.0 | +2.71 | — | 1500 | 93.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 11.1% | -2.56 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +16.00 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 0 | 8 | 8 | Apr 6, 1996 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 1 | 7 | 8 | May 31, 1995 | H2H |
| Mary Joe Fernandez | 2 | 4 | 6 | Apr 13, 1996 | H2H |
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jan 26, 1994 | H2H |
| Patricia Tarabini | 4 | 1 | 5 | Apr 23, 1994 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louise Allen | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 25, 1990 | H2H |
| Sabine Hack | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mar 17, 1990 | H2H |
| Amy Schwartz | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 26, 1989 | H2H |
| Leigh Anne Eldredge | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 20, 1989 | H2H |