H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Samantha Reeves vs Meike Babel H2H: 0-1

Meike Babel holds a 1–0 lead over Samantha Reeves in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Meike Babel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meike Babel won the 1998 Key Biscayne round of 128 6-3 6-2.

USA Age 47 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Meike Babel #79 6-3 6-2 Samantha Reeves #110 Match data Mar 20, 1998* R128 Key Biscayne Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Samantha Reeves #864 #62 523 1,629 30 59 33.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Meike Babel #446 #27 377 1,784 71 86 45.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Samantha Reeves Meike Babel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1991 0–2 0.0% #134 1,486 0 0
17 1992 10–18 35.7% #86 1,523 0 0
18 1993 17–15 53.1% #49 1,616 0 0
19 1998 2–8 20.0% #111 1,480 0 0 1994 13–12 52.0% #46 1,660 0 0
20 1999 4–8 33.3% #121 1,480 0 0 1995 14–10 58.3% #32 1,751 0 0
21 2000 1–4 20.0% #171 1,446 0 0
22 2001 4–3 57.1% #106 1,515 0 0 1997 7–8 46.7% #116 1,702 0 0
23 2002 8–14 36.4% #108 1,544 0 0 1998 9–16 36.0% #100 1,643 0 0
24 2003 8–10 44.4% #74 1,588 0 0
25 2004 3–12 20.0% #198 1,526 0 0 2000 1–5 16.7% #425 1,571 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Samantha Reeves Meike Babel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1992 4 10 14 28.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1993 6 4 10 60.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
19 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 1 2 3 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
20 1999 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 4 3 7 57.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
21 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2002 5 7 12 41.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 4 7 11 36.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2003 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2004 1 5 6 16.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
Career 14 27 41 34.1% 11 22 33 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 20 31 51 39.2% 40 42 82 48.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 9 18 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Samantha Reeves Meike Babel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1991 1486 116.6 20.0% -2.20 0–1 -0.11
17 1992 1524 111.1 0 +43 36.1% -1.25 5–2 (71%) 3–2 (60%) 106.5 +0.29
18 1993 1617 122.8 -68 +61 46.9% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.1 +0.80
19 1998 1480 114.3 +27 +68 29.2% -1.17 1–3 (25%) 0–2 -0.17 1994 1660 133.6 -29 -5 55.6% +0.56 2–4 (33%) 0–5 (0%) 95.6 +1.21
20 1999 1481 106.1 +28 +49 34.6% -1.65 1–1 1–0 +0.52 1995 1752 137.0 -21 -74 59.3% +0.56 2–4 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 100.5 -2.02
21 2000 1447 92.1 +34 18.2% -1.45 1–0 0–1 +0.50
22 2001 1515 113.3 +30 47.1% +0.12 3–0 (100%) 1–0 +0.29 1997 1703 118.3 -34 +27 40.0% -0.43 2–0 0–5 (0%) +0.22
23 2002 1545 121.7 +16 -68 42.6% -0.48 3–7 (30%) 4–5 (44%) 96.7 -0.91 1998 1643 129.8 +3 +57 42.9% -0.63 2–3 (40%) 1–1 -1.62
24 2003 1589 112.2 -1.00 +0.72 0.861 46.5% -29 -69 +14 41.0% -0.92 3–2 (60%) 2–0 -0.54
25 2004 1526 110.0 -3.84 -1.12 0.609 38.9% -9 -32 24.2% -1.70 3–2 (60%) 0–1 -0.74 2000 1572 85.7 +26 15.4% -2.62 1–0 0–1 +0.31
Career 1630 116.7 -2.07 +0.03 0.755 43.6% +12 -24 +14 35.8% -0.99 15–15 (50%) 8–9 (47%) 103.4 -1.18 1784 130.2 -23 +23 45.5% -0.38 18–18 (50%) 8–17 (32%) 98.2 -0.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.