H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Samantha Reeves vs Paola Suarez H2H: 1-0
Samantha Reeves holds a 1–0 lead over Paola Suarez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Samantha Reeves leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Samantha Reeves won the 2003 Indian Wells second round 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2003* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Samantha Reeves | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Paola Suarez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samantha Reeves | #864 | #62 | 523 | 1,629 | 30 | 59 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paola Suarez | #525 | #9 | 2,081 | 1,916 | 223 | 180 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Samantha Reeves | Paola Suarez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #114 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #111 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #171 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #118 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #106 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #80 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #74 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #36 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2004 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #198 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #16 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #238 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #178 | 1,699 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #300 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 |