H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Samantha Smith vs Alexia Dechaume Balleret H2H: 0-1
Alexia Dechaume Balleret holds a 1–0 lead over Samantha Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alexia Dechaume Balleret leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alexia Dechaume Balleret won the 1999 Hilton Head second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 54
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 1999* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | 6-4 6-3 | Samantha Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samantha Smith | #439 | #55 | 504 | 1,617 | 21 | 51 | 29.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alexia Dechaume Balleret | — | — | — | 1,739 | 127 | 181 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Samantha Smith | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #127 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #353 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #141 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #130 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #65 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1999 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #230 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #292 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |