H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Samantha Smith vs Ann Grossman H2H: 0-2
Ann Grossman holds a 2–0 lead over Samantha Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ann Grossman leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ann Grossman won the 1991 Houston fourth round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 54
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 1991* | Houston | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Ann Grossman | 6-4 6-1 | Samantha Smith | Match data |
| Mar 17, 1991* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ann Grossman | 7-5 6-4 | Samantha Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samantha Smith | #439 | #55 | 504 | 1,617 | 21 | 51 | 29.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ann Grossman | #343 | #29 | 384 | 1,888 | 187 | 185 | 50.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Samantha Smith | Ann Grossman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #127 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #50 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #353 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #89 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #141 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #130 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #65 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #75 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1999 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #230 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #292 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |