H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Samantha Smith vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 1-2
Asa Carlsson holds a 2–1 lead over Samantha Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Asa Carlsson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Asa Carlsson won the 1998 US Open first round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 54
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1998* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Asa Carlsson | 6-2 6-4 | Samantha Smith | Match data |
| Oct 3, 1996* | Leipzig | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Samantha Smith | 6-2 7-6 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| Oct 20, 1995* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Asa Carlsson | 3-6 7-6 6-2 | Samantha Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samantha Smith | #439 | #55 | 504 | 1,617 | 21 | 51 | 29.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Samantha Smith | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #127 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #353 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #141 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #130 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #65 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #230 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #292 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |