H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Samantha Smith vs Cecilia Dahlman H2H: 1-2
Cecilia Dahlman holds a 2–1 lead over Samantha Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Cecilia Dahlman leads 1–0 on clay, while Samantha Smith leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Samantha Smith won the 1991 Eastbourne second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 54
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 57
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 1991* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Samantha Smith | 6-3 6-2 | Cecilia Dahlman | Match data |
| Mar 6, 1991* | Boca Raton | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Cecilia Dahlman | 6-0 6-0 | Samantha Smith | Match data |
| Sep 15, 1990* | Athens | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Cecilia Dahlman | 6-1 6-4 | Samantha Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samantha Smith | #439 | #55 | 504 | 1,617 | 21 | 51 | 29.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cecilia Dahlman | #405 | #63 | 17 | 1,673 | 38 | 63 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Samantha Smith | Cecilia Dahlman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #127 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #165 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #353 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #82 | 1,640 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #189 | 1,495 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,499 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #141 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,513 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #130 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1998 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #65 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1999 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #230 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #292 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |