H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Samantha Smith vs Nana Smith H2H: 0-1
Nana Smith holds a 1–0 lead over Samantha Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nana Smith leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nana Smith won the 1991 St. Petersburg third round 2-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 54
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 1991* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Nana Smith | 2-6 6-4 6-4 | Samantha Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samantha Smith | #439 | #55 | 504 | 1,617 | 21 | 51 | 29.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nana Smith | #669 | #51 | 332 | 1,649 | 65 | 114 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Samantha Smith | Nana Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #127 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #113 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #353 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #144 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #317 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #141 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #130 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #65 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #105 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1999 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #230 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #292 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |