H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Samantha Smith vs Raffaella Reggi Concato H2H: 1-0
Samantha Smith holds a 1–0 lead over Raffaella Reggi Concato in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Samantha Smith leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Samantha Smith won the 1990 Eastbourne third round 2-6 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 54
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 1990* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Samantha Smith | 2-6 7-6 6-4 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samantha Smith | #439 | #55 | 504 | 1,617 | 21 | 51 | 29.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Samantha Smith | Raffaella Reggi Concato | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #127 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #353 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #141 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #130 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1998 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #65 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1999 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #230 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #292 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |