H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Samantha Smith vs Sara Gomer H2H: 1-0
Samantha Smith holds a 1–0 lead over Sara Gomer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Samantha Smith leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Samantha Smith won the 1992 Barcelona Olympics second round 2-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 54
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 62
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 1992* | Barcelona Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Clay | Samantha Smith | 2-6 6-3 6-1 | Sara Gomer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samantha Smith | #439 | #55 | 504 | 1,626 | 22 | 52 | 29.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,779 | 105 | 132 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Samantha Smith | Sara Gomer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #127 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #353 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #141 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #130 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1998 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #65 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1999 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #230 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #292 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |