H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Samantha Stosur vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 2-1

Samantha Stosur holds a 2–1 lead over Kimiko Date Krumm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Samantha Stosur leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Samantha Stosur won the 2013 Tokyo third round 6-3 7-6(2).

AUS Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 1
3 main draw meetings
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 26, 2013* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Hard Samantha Stosur #17 6-3 7-6(2) Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
May 29, 2013* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Samantha Stosur #9 6-0 6-2 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Oct 16, 2010* Osaka WTA 250 QF Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 5-7 6-3 7-6(4) Samantha Stosur #8 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Samantha Stosur #531 #4 6,195 2,068 451 335 57.4% 1 0 0 4 4 9
Kimiko Date Krumm 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Samantha Stosur Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 0–2 0.0% #245 1,475 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% 1,562 0 0
19 2003 2–4 33.3% #163 1,492 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% 1,664 0 0
20 2004 17–16 51.5% #65 1,609 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% 1,725 0 0
21 2005 18–22 45.0% #46 1,607 0 0 1992 26–13 66.7% 1,867 0 1
22 2006 29–24 54.7% #29 1,749 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% 1,956 0 2
23 2007 15–15 50.0% #46 1,723 0 0 1994 32–12 72.7% 1,987 0 4
24 2008 17–11 60.7% #52 1,746 0 0 1995 39–12 76.5% 2,029 0 5
25 2009 38–20 65.5% #13 1,885 0 1 1996 31–13 70.5% 2,071 0 7
26 2010 43–19 69.4% #6 1,927 0 2
27 2011 46–21 68.7% #6 1,977 1 3
28 2012 40–23 63.5% #9 1,883 1 3
29 2013 40–22 64.5% #18 1,902 1 5
30 2014 32–22 59.3% #22 1,883 1 6
31 2015 34–22 60.7% #27 1,789 1 8
32 2016 24–19 55.8% #21 1,716 1 8
33 2017 22–19 53.7% #41 1,734 1 9
34 2018 17–23 42.5% #74 1,663 1 9
35 2019 14–16 46.7% #99 1,631 1 9
36 2020 1–3 25.0% #112 1,607 1 9
37 2021 1–9 10.0% #382 1,522 1 9 2008 0–1 0.0% 2,042 0 7
38 2022 1–3 25.0% #529 1,511 1 9 2009 6–11 35.3% 1,841 0 8
39 2010 19–18 51.4% 1,814 0 8
40 2011 7–24 22.6% 1,567 0 8
41 2012 2–14 12.5% 1,454 0 8
42 2013 12–15 44.4% 1,575 0 8
43 2014 11–14 44.0% 1,597 0 8
44 2015 3–6 33.3% 1,574 0 8
46 2017 0–1 0.0% 1,564 0 8