H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sandra Cacic vs Angelica Gavaldon H2H: 1-1
Sandra Cacic and Angelica Gavaldon are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Angelica Gavaldon leads 1–0 on clay, while Sandra Cacic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Cacic won the 1995 San Diego third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1995* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Sandra Cacic | 6-3 6-3 | Angelica Gavaldon | Match data |
| May 10, 1995* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Angelica Gavaldon | 6-2 6-4 | Sandra Cacic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Angelica Gavaldon | #434 | #34 | 237 | 1,733 | 72 | 109 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandra Cacic | Angelica Gavaldon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #264 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #242 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #64 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #219 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #697 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #379 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |