H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Sandra Cacic vs Ann Grossman H2H: 1-2

Ann Grossman holds a 2–1 lead over Sandra Cacic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ann Grossman leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandra Cacic won the 1997 Stanford round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sandra Cacic
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Ann Grossman
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandra Cacic #80 6-2 6-2 Ann Grossman #71 Match data Jul 24, 1997* R32 Stanford Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Ann Grossman #40 6-3 6-4 Sandra Cacic #39 Match data May 11, 1994* R64 Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Ann Grossman #39 6-4 6-1 Sandra Cacic #74 Match data Nov 4, 1993* R32 Oakland Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sandra Cacic #409 #39 548 1,730 58 96 37.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Ann Grossman #343 #29 384 1,887 187 185 50.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sandra Cacic Ann Grossman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1991 0–1 0.0% #310 1,481 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% #378 1,497 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1988 15–12 55.6% #48 1,699 0 0
18 1993 4–6 40.0% #76 1,533 0 0 1989 23–20 53.5% #54 1,736 0 0
19 1994 12–16 42.9% #54 1,617 0 0 1990 23–22 51.1% #50 1,748 0 0
20 1995 7–12 36.8% #114 1,602 0 0 1991 12–19 38.7% #89 1,638 0 0
21 1996 9–12 42.9% #78 1,569 0 1 1992 23–17 57.5% #36 1,733 0 0
22 1997 7–11 38.9% #60 1,581 0 1 1993 30–19 61.2% #35 1,804 0 0
23 1998 7–16 30.4% #82 1,556 0 1 1994 27–21 56.2% #37 1,853 0 0
24 1999 2–7 22.2% #188 1,509 0 1 1995 12–19 38.7% #88 1,681 0 0
25 2000 0–1 0.0% #140 1,505 0 1 1996 10–14 41.7% #72 1,665 0 0
26 2001 9–11 45.0% #117 1,577 0 1 1997 10–17 37.0% #75 1,615 0 0
27 2002 0–1 0.0% #322 1,565 0 1 1998 2–4 33.3% #283 1,595 0 0
28 2003 1–2 33.3% #395 1,548 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sandra Cacic Ann Grossman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
18 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 16 11 27 59.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1994 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1990 9 12 21 42.9% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1995 4 6 10 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1996 9 6 15 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 15 8 23 65.2% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1997 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1998 5 9 14 35.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 16 10 26 61.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1999 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 5 10 15 33.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2001 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
28 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 38 48 86 44.2% 10 31 41 24.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 10 15 33.3% — 111 106 217 51.2% 59 56 115 51.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 11 14 25 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sandra Cacic Ann Grossman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1991 1482 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.22 1987 1497 101.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.15
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1699 133.9 — — — — +28 — — 54.1% +0.13 4–3 (57%) 0–5 (0%) 100.1 +0.16
18 1993 1534 121.2 — — — — +55 — — 36.0% -0.92 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — -0.02 1989 1737 136.2 — — — — +43 -89 — 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 4–5 (44%) 101.2 -1.22
19 1994 1617 134.8 — — — — +7 -51 — 43.9% -0.56 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 103.5 -0.15 1990 1749 136.3 — — — — -12 +8 — 51.0% +0.02 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.48
20 1995 1602 122.7 — — — — +22 -68 — 40.9% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.03 1991 1638 126.7 — — — — -16 +89 — 44.3% +0.06 3–7 (30%) 2–6 (25%) 91.9 +0.49
21 1996 1569 120.7 — — — — +101 -123 — 43.5% -0.54 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.01 1992 1733 132.9 — — — — +24 -9 — 52.9% -0.03 6–3 (67%) 6–1 (86%) 108.7 +1.73
22 1997 1582 124.7 — — — — +81 — +18 43.6% -0.62 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 96.6 -0.41 1993 1805 140.5 — — — — +9 -60 — 59.6% +0.62 6–7 (46%) 6–3 (67%) 103.6 +0.77
23 1998 1556 129.8 — — — — +49 -109 — 35.2% -1.04 3–7 (30%) 3–5 (38%) 96.6 -0.12 1994 1853 146.2 — — — — 0 -73 -249 53.6% -0.01 10–6 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 107.3 -1.02
24 1999 1509 93.4 — — — — +60 -82 — 23.5% -2.18 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.42 1995 1681 123.7 — — — — +38 +44 — 40.8% -0.46 4–5 (44%) 3–9 (25%) 92.7 +0.33
25 2000 1505 103.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.19 1996 1666 130.2 — — — — +49 +8 — 42.9% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — -0.99
26 2001 1578 126.4 — — — — +38 -178 — 41.3% -0.54 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.74 1997 1615 123.7 — — — — +26 +98 — 38.6% -1.25 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.1 -0.41
27 2002 1565 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.02 1998 1595 103.2 — — — — +41 +76 — 33.3% -1.58 — 1–0 — +0.11
28 2003 1548 101.1 — — — — +35 — — 28.6% -0.57 1–0 0–2 — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1731 130.9 — — — — +50 -93 +18 39.1% -0.75 23–23 (50%) 14–17 (45%) 102.9 -0.59 — 1888 140.3 — — — — +18 +6 -249 49.9% -0.10 53–53 (50%) 31–39 (44%) 99.5 -0.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.