H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sandra Cacic vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 1-2
Asa Carlsson holds a 2–1 lead over Sandra Cacic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Asa Carlsson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Asa Carlsson won the 1996 German Open second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 1996* | German Open | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Asa Carlsson | 6-2 6-3 | Sandra Cacic | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1995* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Asa Carlsson | 6-4 6-2 | Sandra Cacic | Match data |
| Jan 18, 1995* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Sandra Cacic | 6-2 6-2 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sandra Cacic | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |