H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sandra Cacic vs Claudia Porwik H2H: 1-0
Sandra Cacic holds a 1–0 lead over Claudia Porwik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Cacic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Cacic won the 1993 US Open first round 2-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1993* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Sandra Cacic | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | Claudia Porwik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Claudia Porwik | #579 | #29 | 148 | 1,788 | 114 | 146 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandra Cacic | Claudia Porwik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #96 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #104 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #68 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #29 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #92 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #153 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |