H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sandra Cacic vs Elena Tatarkova H2H: 0-2
Elena Tatarkova holds a 2–0 lead over Sandra Cacic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elena Tatarkova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Tatarkova won the 1999 Key Biscayne first round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 49
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 1999* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Elena Tatarkova | 6-3 6-1 | Sandra Cacic | Match data |
| Jul 30, 1998* | Stanford | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Elena Tatarkova | 7-6 2-6 7-5 | Sandra Cacic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Elena Tatarkova | #532 | #45 | 581 | 1,601 | 21 | 49 | 30.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandra Cacic | Elena Tatarkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #192 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #196 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #116 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #176 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |