H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Sandra Cacic vs Ginger Helgeson H2H: 0-1

Ginger Helgeson holds a 1–0 lead over Sandra Cacic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ginger Helgeson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ginger Helgeson won the 1993 Amelia Island round of 64 6-2 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sandra Cacic
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Ginger Helgeson
USA Age 57 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ginger Helgeson #60 6-2 4-6 6-4 Sandra Cacic #173 Match data Apr 7, 1993* R64 Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sandra Cacic #409 #39 548 1,730 58 96 37.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Ginger Helgeson #467 #29 246 1,865 94 95 49.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sandra Cacic Ginger Helgeson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1991 0–1 0.0% #310 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1993 4–6 40.0% #76 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1994 12–16 42.9% #54 1,617 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1995 7–12 36.8% #114 1,602 0 0 1989 0–2 0.0% #239 1,485 0 0
21 1996 9–12 42.9% #78 1,569 0 1 1990 1–2 33.3% #246 1,498 0 0
22 1997 7–11 38.9% #60 1,581 0 1 1991 17–17 50.0% #58 1,647 0 0
23 1998 7–16 30.4% #82 1,556 0 1 1992 12–15 44.4% #71 1,648 0 0
24 1999 2–7 22.2% #188 1,509 0 1 1993 22–20 52.4% #54 1,736 0 0
25 2000 0–1 0.0% #140 1,505 0 1 1994 29–17 63.0% #30 1,777 0 1
26 2001 9–11 45.0% #117 1,577 0 1 1995 8–7 53.3% #111 1,772 0 1
27 2002 0–1 0.0% #322 1,565 0 1 1996 0–2 0.0% #792 1,721 0 1
28 2003 1–2 33.3% #395 1,548 0 1 1997 3–8 27.3% #167 1,639 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1998 2–5 28.6% #152 1,572 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sandra Cacic Ginger Helgeson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 4 6 10 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1996 9 6 15 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1997 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1998 5 9 14 35.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 8 9 17 47.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1999 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 11 9 20 55.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 20 9 29 69.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2001 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 38 48 86 44.2% 10 31 41 24.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 10 15 33.3% — 55 50 105 52.4% 28 24 52 53.8% 9 13 22 40.9% 2 8 10 20.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sandra Cacic Ginger Helgeson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1991 1482 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 1534 121.2 — — — — +55 — — 36.0% -0.92 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 1617 134.8 — — — — +7 -51 — 43.9% -0.56 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 103.5 -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 1602 122.7 — — — — +22 -68 — 40.9% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.03 1989 1486 104.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — +0.02
21 1996 1569 120.7 — — — — +101 -123 — 43.5% -0.54 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.01 1990 1498 100.1 — — — — — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — -0.32
22 1997 1582 124.7 — — — — +81 — +18 43.6% -0.62 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 96.6 -0.41 1991 1647 138.4 — — — — -14 +44 — 48.1% -0.22 6–3 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 106.2 -1.02
23 1998 1556 129.8 — — — — +49 -109 — 35.2% -1.04 3–7 (30%) 3–5 (38%) 96.6 -0.12 1992 1649 128.8 — — — — +13 +33 -159 48.5% -0.17 4–8 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 98.8 +0.26
24 1999 1509 93.4 — — — — +60 -82 — 23.5% -2.18 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.42 1993 1737 139.0 — — — — -44 -4 -162 52.6% +0.62 7–6 (54%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.91
25 2000 1505 103.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.19 1994 1777 146.6 — — — — +6 -21 -203 61.0% +0.87 5–3 (63%) 4–1 (80%) 104.6 +1.21
26 2001 1578 126.4 — — — — +38 -178 — 41.3% -0.54 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.74 1995 1773 137.3 — — — — -13 +12 — 60.0% +0.67 0–4 (0%) 0–2 — -0.56
27 2002 1565 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.02 1996 1721 92.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.20
28 2003 1548 101.1 — — — — +35 — — 28.6% -0.57 1–0 0–2 — +0.14 1997 1639 107.6 — — — — -14 — -6 30.4% -1.22 0–1 — — -0.15
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1573 99.1 — — — — +16 — — 41.2% -0.71 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 94.9 +1.00
Career — 1731 130.9 — — — — +50 -93 +18 39.1% -0.75 23–23 (50%) 14–17 (45%) 102.9 -0.59 — 1865 140.4 — — — — -9 +11 -127 50.6% +0.14 23–28 (45%) 18–17 (51%) 99.4 -0.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.