H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sandra Cacic vs Helena Sukova H2H: 1-0

Sandra Cacic holds a 1–0 lead over Helena Sukova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Cacic leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sandra Cacic won the 1994 Chicago round of 16 4-6 7-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sandra Cacic
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Helena Sukova
CZE Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandra Cacic #80 4-6 7-6 6-4 Helena Sukova #14 Match data Feb 11, 1994* R16 Chicago Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sandra Cacic #409 #39 548 1,730 58 96 37.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Helena Sukova #102 #4 735 2,218 581 300 65.9% 0 0 0 3 6 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sandra Cacic Helena Sukova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1991 0–1 0.0% #310 1,481 0 0 1981 6–4 60.0% — 1,584 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1982 23–23 50.0% — 1,756 0 0
18 1993 4–6 40.0% #76 1,533 0 0 1983 33–20 62.3% — 1,907 0 0
19 1994 12–16 42.9% #54 1,617 0 0 1984 48–23 67.6% #7 2,041 0 1
20 1995 7–12 36.8% #114 1,602 0 0 1985 54–21 72.0% #9 2,028 0 1
21 1996 9–12 42.9% #78 1,569 0 1 1986 69–21 76.7% #5 2,151 0 3
22 1997 7–11 38.9% #60 1,581 0 1 1987 58–19 75.3% #7 2,129 0 5
23 1998 7–16 30.4% #82 1,556 0 1 1988 49–20 71.0% #8 2,098 0 5
24 1999 2–7 22.2% #188 1,509 0 1 1989 39–15 72.2% #8 2,036 0 6
25 2000 0–1 0.0% #140 1,505 0 1 1990 41–17 70.7% #14 2,024 0 6
26 2001 9–11 45.0% #117 1,577 0 1 1991 34–18 65.4% #17 1,958 0 7
27 2002 0–1 0.0% #322 1,565 0 1 1992 39–16 70.9% #12 1,965 0 9
28 2003 1–2 33.3% #395 1,548 0 1 1993 24–15 61.5% #17 1,922 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 1994 21–14 60.0% #22 1,887 0 9
30 — — — — — — — 1995 18–15 54.5% #29 1,819 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 1996 17–16 51.5% #35 1,776 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 1997 8–21 27.6% #80 1,655 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 1998 0–2 0.0% #102 1,632 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sandra Cacic Helena Sukova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 9 16 43.8%
18 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1983 8 4 12 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0%
19 1994 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1984 12 5 17 70.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 16 4 20 80.0% 18 9 27 66.7%
20 1995 4 6 10 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 18 5 23 78.3% 13 6 19 68.4%
21 1996 9 6 15 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1986 23 5 28 82.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% 27 10 37 73.0%
22 1997 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 17 4 21 81.0% 20 6 26 76.9%
23 1998 5 9 14 35.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 21 9 30 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 11 5 16 68.8%
24 1999 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 26 6 32 81.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 4 10 60.0%
25 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 17 7 24 70.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 12 6 18 66.7%
26 2001 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 16 6 22 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3%
27 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 20 7 27 74.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 4 14 71.4%
28 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 5 8 13 38.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 3 10 70.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 11 13 15.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 38 48 86 44.2% 10 31 41 24.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 10 15 33.3% — 213 105 318 67.0% 75 53 128 58.6% 125 49 174 71.8% 164 90 254 64.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sandra Cacic Helena Sukova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1991 1482 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.22 1981 1584 127.8 — — — — — — +54 59.1% +0.91 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.28
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1756 137.3 — — — — -64 -77 -97 48.2% -0.15 11–7 (61%) 4–7 (36%) 105.5 -2.58
18 1993 1534 121.2 — — — — +55 — — 36.0% -0.92 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — -0.02 1983 1907 149.3 — — — — -85 -97 -127 59.7% +0.67 8–5 (62%) 6–8 (43%) 102.3 -2.48
19 1994 1617 134.8 — — — — +7 -51 — 43.9% -0.56 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 103.5 -0.15 1984 2042 154.9 — — — — -99 -323 +10 60.7% +0.75 20–6 (77%) 9–10 (47%) 108.0 -2.37
20 1995 1602 122.7 — — — — +22 -68 — 40.9% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.03 1985 2029 162.4 — — — — -21 -243 +104 68.7% +1.34 9–7 (56%) 9–7 (56%) 101.9 -3.44
21 1996 1569 120.7 — — — — +101 -123 — 43.5% -0.54 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.01 1986 2152 173.6 — — — — +12 -258 +29 73.5% +1.77 11–9 (55%) 7–9 (44%) 97.5 -7.60
22 1997 1582 124.7 — — — — +81 — +18 43.6% -0.62 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 96.6 -0.41 1987 2130 164.9 — — — — +25 -243 +121 69.5% +1.40 17–7 (71%) 11–4 (73%) 105.2 -4.98
23 1998 1556 129.8 — — — — +49 -109 — 35.2% -1.04 3–7 (30%) 3–5 (38%) 96.6 -0.12 1988 2099 164.2 — — — — +36 -123 +89 67.1% +1.03 10–4 (71%) 14–3 (82%) 109.5 -5.27
24 1999 1509 93.4 — — — — +60 -82 — 23.5% -2.18 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.42 1989 2037 158.2 — — — — +97 -141 +86 67.5% +1.04 9–3 (75%) 10–3 (77%) 106.3 -1.47
25 2000 1505 103.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.19 1990 2025 160.0 — — — — +46 -104 +169 64.7% +0.88 13–4 (76%) 7–2 (78%) 106.6 -0.53
26 2001 1578 126.4 — — — — +38 -178 — 41.3% -0.54 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.74 1991 1958 153.8 — — — — +56 -26 +161 63.2% +1.02 9–6 (60%) 5–7 (42%) 95.3 +0.66
27 2002 1565 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.02 1992 1966 153.3 — — — — +48 -64 +185 69.2% +1.42 7–5 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 96.8 +2.03
28 2003 1548 101.1 — — — — +35 — — 28.6% -0.57 1–0 0–2 — +0.14 1993 1922 151.2 — — — — +11 — +198 60.2% +0.82 7–5 (58%) 4–6 (40%) 94.8 +0.04
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1887 144.4 — — — — +13 -45 +168 56.1% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 2–6 (25%) 97.3 +1.22
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1820 144.1 — — — — +24 +33 +207 53.9% +0.05 7–5 (58%) 9–2 (82%) 105.6 -0.11
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1776 135.6 — — — — +9 -3 +295 50.6% +0.28 7–6 (54%) 4–4 (50%) 97.0 +0.50
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1655 126.9 — — — — -12 +65 +386 32.3% -1.05 2–7 (22%) 2–3 (40%) 92.0 -0.96
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1632 97.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.34 0–2 — — -0.23
Career — 1731 130.9 — — — — +50 -93 +18 39.1% -0.75 23–23 (50%) 14–17 (45%) 102.9 -0.59 — 2218 162.3 — — — — +10 -125 +96 62.6% +0.89 156–93 (63%) 105–89 (54%) 103.0 -3.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.