H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sandra Cacic vs Kimberly Po Messerli H2H: 0-2
Kimberly Po Messerli holds a 2–0 lead over Sandra Cacic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kimberly Po Messerli leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimberly Po Messerli won the 1997 Oklahoma quarterfinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 54
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 1997* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Kimberly Po Messerli | 6-3 6-3 | Sandra Cacic | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1993* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Kimberly Po Messerli | 6-3 6-2 | Sandra Cacic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimberly Po Messerli | — | — | — | 1,878 | 118 | 133 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandra Cacic | Kimberly Po Messerli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 20–13 | 60.6% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 27–20 | 57.4% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |