H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Sandra Cacic vs Linda Wild H2H: 1-0
Sandra Cacic holds a 1–0 lead over Linda Wild in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Cacic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Cacic won the 1997 Auckland fourth round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 1997* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Sandra Cacic | 6-4 7-5 | Linda Wild | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,823 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandra Cacic | Linda Wild | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,629 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,570 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,543 | 0 | 5 |