H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Sandra Cacic holds a 1–0 lead over Linda Wild in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Cacic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Cacic won the 1997 ASB Classic round of 16 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Cacic | 6-4 7-5 | Linda Wild | Match data | Jan 3, 1997* | R16 | ASB Classic | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,815 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sandra Cacic | Linda Wild | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 |
| 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,809 | 0 | 5 |
| 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,625 | 0 | 5 |
| 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,566 | 0 | 5 |
| 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,540 | 0 | 5 |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Sandra Cacic | Linda Wild | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1991 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1989 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1990 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 1995 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 1996 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 1997 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1993 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% |
| 1998 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1994 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 1999 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% |
| 2000 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 2001 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1997 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 38 | 48 | 86 | 44.2% | 10 | 31 | 41 | 24.4% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | Career | 70 | 79 | 149 | 47.0% | 19 | 30 | 49 | 38.8% | 19 | 19 | 38 | 50.0% | 27 | 18 | 45 | 60.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Sandra Cacic | Linda Wild | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1991 | 1482 | 95.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.22 | 1972 | 1493 | 98.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.09 |
| 1993 | 1534 | 121.2 | — | — | — | — | +55 | — | — | 36.0% | -0.92 | 4–1 (80%) | 0–1 | — | -0.02 | 1989 | 1457 | 103.4 | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | — | 17.6% | -2.06 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.09 |
| 1994 | 1617 | 134.8 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -51 | — | 43.9% | -0.56 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–3 (57%) | 103.5 | -0.15 | 1990 | 1555 | 123.6 | — | — | — | — | +1 | -3 | — | 43.2% | -0.52 | 3–1 (75%) | 2–1 (67%) | 104.4 | -0.32 |
| 1995 | 1602 | 122.7 | — | — | — | — | +22 | -68 | — | 40.9% | -0.23 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -0.03 | 1991 | 1721 | 134.6 | — | — | — | — | -71 | -49 | -115 | 50.0% | -0.26 | 8–4 (67%) | 4–2 (67%) | 107.4 | -0.67 |
| 1996 | 1569 | 120.7 | — | — | — | — | +101 | -123 | — | 43.5% | -0.54 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | -0.01 | 1992 | 1733 | 139.7 | — | — | — | — | -89 | -75 | +45 | 47.8% | -0.05 | 6–6 (50%) | 4–2 (67%) | 103.9 | -1.52 |
| 1997 | 1582 | 124.7 | — | — | — | — | +81 | — | +18 | 43.6% | -0.62 | 0–3 (0%) | 2–1 (67%) | 96.6 | -0.41 | 1993 | 1765 | 132.8 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -174 | -41 | 56.4% | +0.47 | 7–5 (58%) | 3–4 (43%) | 99.5 | +0.50 |
| 1998 | 1556 | 129.8 | — | — | — | — | +49 | -109 | — | 35.2% | -1.04 | 3–7 (30%) | 3–5 (38%) | 96.6 | -0.12 | 1994 | 1741 | 132.8 | — | — | — | — | -38 | -164 | +80 | 51.6% | -0.05 | 8–9 (47%) | 6–4 (60%) | 98.6 | -1.90 |
| 1999 | 1509 | 93.4 | — | — | — | — | +60 | -82 | — | 23.5% | -2.18 | 1–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.42 | 1995 | 1758 | 128.9 | — | — | — | — | +19 | -201 | +14 | 58.0% | +0.57 | 3–6 (33%) | 4–4 (50%) | 96.1 | +1.45 |
| 2000 | 1505 | 103.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.19 | 1996 | 1810 | 144.4 | — | — | — | — | +25 | -227 | -22 | 55.2% | +0.55 | 7–6 (54%) | 6–8 (43%) | 101.6 | +0.67 |
| 2001 | 1578 | 126.4 | — | — | — | — | +38 | -178 | — | 41.3% | -0.54 | 5–1 (83%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.74 | 1997 | 1625 | 106.2 | — | — | — | — | +96 | -90 | +72 | 25.6% | -2.15 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–3 (40%) | 95.7 | +0.19 |
| 2002 | 1565 | 98.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.02 | 1999 | 1567 | 91.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.38 |
| 2003 | 1548 | 101.1 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | — | 28.6% | -0.57 | 1–0 | 0–2 | — | +0.14 | 2000 | 1541 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.42 |
| Career | 1731 | 130.9 | — | — | — | — | +50 | -93 | +18 | 39.1% | -0.75 | 23–23 (50%) | 14–17 (45%) | 102.9 | -0.59 | Career | 1816 | 137.3 | — | — | — | — | -7 | -98 | +18 | 48.5% | -0.14 | 43–42 (51%) | 31–29 (52%) | 102.2 | -0.65 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Davenport | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 2, 2001 | H2H |
| Amy Frazier | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 22, 2001 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 22, 2000 | H2H |
| Nathalie Tauziat | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 19, 1998 | H2H |
| Barbara Paulus | 1 | 2 | 3 | May 15, 1998 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Shriver | 3 | 2 | 5 | Nov 8, 1996 | H2H |
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 0 | 5 | 5 | Nov 1, 1996 | H2H |
| Rachel Mcquillan | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 28, 1995 | H2H |
| Tami Whitlinger Jones | 5 | 0 | 5 | Feb 17, 1994 | H2H |
| Nicole Bradtke | 3 | 2 | 5 | Feb 20, 1993 | H2H |