H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Sandra Cacic vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 1-0

Sandra Cacic holds a 1–0 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Cacic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Cacic won the 1994 Oklahoma round of 16 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sandra Cacic
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandra Cacic #59 6-4 6-2 Lori Mcneil #22 Match data Feb 18, 1994* R16 Oklahoma Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sandra Cacic #409 #39 548 1,730 58 96 37.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sandra Cacic Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1991 0–1 0.0% #310 1,481 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1993 4–6 40.0% #76 1,533 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1994 12–16 42.9% #54 1,617 0 0 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1
20 1995 7–12 36.8% #114 1,602 0 0 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1
21 1996 9–12 42.9% #78 1,569 0 1 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1997 7–11 38.9% #60 1,581 0 1 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1998 7–16 30.4% #82 1,556 0 1 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3
24 1999 2–7 22.2% #188 1,509 0 1 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5
25 2000 0–1 0.0% #140 1,505 0 1 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 2001 9–11 45.0% #117 1,577 0 1 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6
27 2002 0–1 0.0% #322 1,565 0 1 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 2003 1–2 33.3% #395 1,548 0 1 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,670 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sandra Cacic Lori Mcneil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1995 4 6 10 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1996 9 6 15 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1997 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1%
23 1998 5 9 14 35.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4%
24 1999 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
26 2001 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 38 48 86 44.2% 10 31 41 24.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 10 15 33.3% — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sandra Cacic Lori Mcneil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1991 1482 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.22 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24
18 1993 1534 121.2 — — — — +55 — — 36.0% -0.92 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — -0.02 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35
19 1994 1617 134.8 — — — — +7 -51 — 43.9% -0.56 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 103.5 -0.15 1983 1569 107.1 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06
20 1995 1602 122.7 — — — — +22 -68 — 40.9% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.03 1984 1608 115.2 — — — — +12 -54 +10 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.27
21 1996 1569 120.7 — — — — +101 -123 — 43.5% -0.54 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.01 1985 1587 118.3 — — — — +22 -103 +5 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.20
22 1997 1582 124.7 — — — — +81 — +18 43.6% -0.62 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 96.6 -0.41 1986 1884 144.9 — — — — -9 -341 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.49
23 1998 1556 129.8 — — — — +49 -109 — 35.2% -1.04 3–7 (30%) 3–5 (38%) 96.6 -0.12 1987 2007 158.4 — — — — +54 -355 -205 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.78
24 1999 1509 93.4 — — — — +60 -82 — 23.5% -2.18 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.42 1988 1901 142.6 — — — — +37 -185 +39 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +2.06
25 2000 1505 103.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.19 1989 1760 134.7 — — — — +60 -78 +79 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.23
26 2001 1578 126.4 — — — — +38 -178 — 41.3% -0.54 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.74 1990 1695 134.9 — — — — +14 -74 +200 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80
27 2002 1565 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.02 1991 1870 151.0 — — — — +12 -241 +42 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74
28 2003 1548 101.1 — — — — +35 — — 28.6% -0.57 1–0 0–2 — +0.14 1992 1962 156.8 — — — — -4 -303 +76 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1871 145.9 — — — — -58 -207 +244 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +384 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +315 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
Career — 1731 130.9 — — — — +50 -93 +18 39.1% -0.75 23–23 (50%) 14–17 (45%) 102.9 -0.59 — 2025 149.2 — — — — +14 -212 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.