H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sandra Cacic vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 1-1
Sandra Cacic and Marianne Werdel Witmeyer are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 1–0 on carpet, while Sandra Cacic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Cacic won the 1997 Oklahoma fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 1997* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Sandra Cacic | 6-4 6-3 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Oct 6, 1994* | Zurich | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-3 6-4 | Sandra Cacic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sandra Cacic | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |