H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sandra Cacic vs Meike Babel H2H: 2-1
Sandra Cacic holds a 2–1 lead over Meike Babel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Sandra Cacic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Cacic won the 1998 Auckland fourth round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 1998* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Sandra Cacic | (w/o) | Meike Babel | Match data |
| Apr 13, 1995* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Meike Babel | 6-1 6-3 | Sandra Cacic | Match data |
| Mar 25, 1994* | Houston | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Sandra Cacic | 7-5 4-6 6-2 | Meike Babel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Meike Babel | #446 | #27 | 377 | 1,784 | 71 | 86 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandra Cacic | Meike Babel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #86 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #49 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #46 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #116 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #425 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |