H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sandra Cacic vs Nicole Arendt H2H: 0-1

Nicole Arendt holds a 1–0 lead over Sandra Cacic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Arendt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Arendt won the 1996 US Open round of 128 6-2 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sandra Cacic
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nicole Arendt
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicole Arendt #82 6-2 7-6 Sandra Cacic #75 Match data Aug 28, 1996* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sandra Cacic #409 #39 548 1,730 58 96 37.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Nicole Arendt #433 #49 487 1,775 67 75 47.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sandra Cacic Nicole Arendt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1991 0–1 0.0% #310 1,481 0 0 1986 2–2 50.0% #164 1,537 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1987 0–1 0.0% #366 1,519 0 0
18 1993 4–6 40.0% #76 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1994 12–16 42.9% #54 1,617 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1995 7–12 36.8% #114 1,602 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1996 9–12 42.9% #78 1,569 0 1 1991 1–2 33.3% #218 1,523 0 0
22 1997 7–11 38.9% #60 1,581 0 1 1992 4–4 50.0% #124 1,570 0 0
23 1998 7–16 30.4% #82 1,556 0 1 1993 12–15 44.4% #88 1,602 0 0
24 1999 2–7 22.2% #188 1,509 0 1 1994 14–12 53.8% #73 1,700 0 0
25 2000 0–1 0.0% #140 1,505 0 1 1995 11–15 42.3% #117 1,666 0 0
26 2001 9–11 45.0% #117 1,577 0 1 1996 9–11 45.0% #79 1,675 0 0
27 2002 0–1 0.0% #322 1,565 0 1 1997 9–8 52.9% #63 1,753 0 0
28 2003 1–2 33.3% #395 1,548 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — 1999 5–4 55.6% #143 1,750 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #433 1,732 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sandra Cacic Nicole Arendt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 4 6 10 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 9 6 15 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1997 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1998 5 9 14 35.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1999 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 6 6 12 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2001 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 38 48 86 44.2% 10 31 41 24.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 10 15 33.3% — 39 42 81 48.1% 6 11 17 35.3% 21 15 36 58.3% 1 7 8 12.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sandra Cacic Nicole Arendt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1991 1482 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.22 1986 1537 112.1 — — — — +62 — — 50.0% +0.34 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.09
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1520 99.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.26
18 1993 1534 121.2 — — — — +55 — — 36.0% -0.92 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 1617 134.8 — — — — +7 -51 — 43.9% -0.56 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 103.5 -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 1602 122.7 — — — — +22 -68 — 40.9% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 1569 120.7 — — — — +101 -123 — 43.5% -0.54 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.01 1991 1523 110.9 — — — — +27 — — 42.9% -1.57 0–1 1–0 — -0.04
22 1997 1582 124.7 — — — — +81 — +18 43.6% -0.62 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 96.6 -0.41 1992 1570 112.2 — — — — +24 — — 47.1% -0.47 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.27
23 1998 1556 129.8 — — — — +49 -109 — 35.2% -1.04 3–7 (30%) 3–5 (38%) 96.6 -0.12 1993 1602 130.5 — — — — +19 — -10 44.6% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 1–1 — +0.08
24 1999 1509 93.4 — — — — +60 -82 — 23.5% -2.18 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.42 1994 1701 125.2 — — — — -25 — -95 54.2% +0.41 3–4 (43%) 5–2 (71%) 102.1 -0.54
25 2000 1505 103.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.19 1995 1666 123.1 — — — — +1 -123 -43 43.9% -0.58 2–3 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 101.3 -1.61
26 2001 1578 126.4 — — — — +38 -178 — 41.3% -0.54 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.74 1996 1676 126.6 — — — — +9 -190 +55 43.5% -0.28 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 102.1 +0.40
27 2002 1565 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.02 1997 1754 129.2 — — — — -82 -179 +12 50.0% -0.05 4–2 (67%) 0–1 — -0.90
28 2003 1548 101.1 — — — — +35 — — 28.6% -0.57 1–0 0–2 — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1751 114.1 — — — — — -192 +44 55.0% +0.25 1–1 1–1 — -0.33
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1732 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.15
Career — 1731 130.9 — — — — +50 -93 +18 39.1% -0.75 23–23 (50%) 14–17 (45%) 102.9 -0.59 — 1775 131.8 — — — — +2 -167 -8 47.3% -0.19 23–21 (52%) 17–16 (52%) 105.8 -1.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.