H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sandra Cacic vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 1-1
Sandra Cacic and Patricia Hy Boulais are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Patricia Hy Boulais won the 1996 Amelia Island second round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 60
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 1996* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Patricia Hy Boulais | 6-4 6-1 | Sandra Cacic | Match data |
| Mar 29, 1995* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Sandra Cacic | 6-4 6-0 | Patricia Hy Boulais | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Patricia Hy Boulais | — | — | — | 1,907 | 140 | 163 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandra Cacic | Patricia Hy Boulais | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 12–19 | 38.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |