H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sandra Cacic vs Rene Simpson H2H: 0-1
Rene Simpson holds a 1–0 lead over Sandra Cacic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rene Simpson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rene Simpson won the 1996 Manhattan Beach second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 1996* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Rene Simpson | 6-3 6-3 | Sandra Cacic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Rene Simpson | #546 | #70 | 256 | 1,663 | 44 | 83 | 34.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandra Cacic | Rene Simpson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #132 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #109 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #180 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #132 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #104 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #122 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #154 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #109 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #548 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |