H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Sandra Cacic holds a 1–0 lead over Siobhan Drake Brockman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Cacic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Cacic won the 1996 Australian Open round of 64 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Cacic | 6-2 7-5 | Siobhan Drake Brockman | Match data | Jan 19, 1996* | R64 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Siobhan Drake Brockman | — | — | — | 1,529 | 3 | 12 | 20.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandra Cacic | Siobhan Drake Brockman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Sandra Cacic | Siobhan Drake Brockman | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1991 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1993 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1996 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1997 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1996 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1997 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1998 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1999 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2000 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2001 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 38 | 48 | 86 | 44.2% | 10 | 31 | 41 | 24.4% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | — | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Sandra Cacic | Siobhan Drake Brockman | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1991 | 1482 | 95.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1498 | 104.0 | — | — | — | — | +43 | — | — | 30.0% | -2.00 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.20 |
| 18 | 1993 | 1534 | 121.2 | — | — | — | — | +55 | — | — | 36.0% | -0.92 | 4–1 (80%) | 0–1 | — | -0.02 | 1996 | 1510 | 103.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.15 |
| 19 | 1994 | 1617 | 134.8 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -51 | — | 43.9% | -0.56 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–3 (57%) | 103.5 | -0.15 | 1997 | 1472 | 111.7 | — | — | — | — | +55 | — | — | 20.0% | -1.93 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.06 |
| 20 | 1995 | 1602 | 122.7 | — | — | — | — | +22 | -68 | — | 40.9% | -0.23 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -0.03 | 1998 | 1443 | 88.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.35 |
| 21 | 1996 | 1569 | 120.7 | — | — | — | — | +101 | -123 | — | 43.5% | -0.54 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1997 | 1582 | 124.7 | — | — | — | — | +81 | — | +18 | 43.6% | -0.62 | 0–3 (0%) | 2–1 (67%) | 96.6 | -0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1998 | 1556 | 129.8 | — | — | — | — | +49 | -109 | — | 35.2% | -1.04 | 3–7 (30%) | 3–5 (38%) | 96.6 | -0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1999 | 1509 | 93.4 | — | — | — | — | +60 | -82 | — | 23.5% | -2.18 | 1–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2000 | 1505 | 103.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2001 | 1578 | 126.4 | — | — | — | — | +38 | -178 | — | 41.3% | -0.54 | 5–1 (83%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.74 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2002 | 1565 | 98.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 1548 | 101.1 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | — | 28.6% | -0.57 | 1–0 | 0–2 | — | +0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1731 | 130.9 | — | — | — | — | +50 | -93 | +18 | 39.1% | -0.75 | 23–23 (50%) | 14–17 (45%) | 102.9 | -0.59 | — | 1530 | 104.4 | — | — | — | — | +51 | — | — | 23.5% | -2.06 | 2–2 (50%) | — | — | +2.40 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Davenport | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 2, 2001 | H2H |
| Amy Frazier | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 22, 2001 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 22, 2000 | H2H |
| Nathalie Tauziat | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 19, 1998 | H2H |
| Barbara Paulus | 1 | 2 | 3 | May 15, 1998 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Raymond | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jan 15, 1997 | H2H |
| Jana Kandarr | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jan 21, 1998 | H2H |
| Adriana Rikl Gersi | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jan 14, 1998 | H2H |
| Rachel Mcquillan | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 25, 1997 | H2H |
| Anne-Gaelle Sidot | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 31, 1997 | H2H |