H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sandra Cacic vs Steffi Graf H2H: 0-3
Steffi Graf holds a 3–0 lead over Sandra Cacic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Steffi Graf leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Steffi Graf won the 1996 Key Biscayne second round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 1996* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Steffi Graf | 6-1 7-5 | Sandra Cacic | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1994* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Steffi Graf | 6-0 6-2 | Sandra Cacic | Match data |
| Aug 15, 1994 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Steffi Graf | 6-2 6-2 | Sandra Cacic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Steffi Graf | #3 | #1 | 5,028 | 2,600 | 866 | 109 | 88.8% | 22 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 50 | 106 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandra Cacic | Steffi Graf | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #22 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #6 | 2,037 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 63–6 | 91.3% | #3 | 2,329 | 0 | 8 |
| 18 | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 70–2 | 97.2% | #1 | 2,505 | 1 | 19 |
| 19 | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 68–3 | 95.8% | #1 | 2,535 | 5 | 29 |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 85–2 | 97.7% | #1 | 2,584 | 8 | 43 |
| 21 | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,510 | 9 | 53 |
| 22 | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 64–8 | 88.9% | #2 | 2,418 | 10 | 60 |
| 23 | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 61–6 | 91.0% | #2 | 2,448 | 11 | 68 |
| 24 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 77–5 | 93.9% | #1 | 2,510 | 14 | 78 |
| 25 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 58–6 | 90.6% | #1 | 2,417 | 15 | 85 |
| 26 | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 48–2 | 96.0% | #1 | 2,466 | 18 | 94 |
| 27 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 51–4 | 92.7% | #1 | 2,446 | 21 | 101 |
| 28 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 16–4 | 80.0% | #28 | 2,353 | 21 | 102 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 33–9 | 78.6% | #9 | 2,284 | 21 | 105 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 34–9 | 79.1% | #3 | 2,242 | 22 | 106 |