H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sandra Cacic vs Wiltrud Probst H2H: 0-1
Wiltrud Probst holds a 1–0 lead over Sandra Cacic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Wiltrud Probst leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wiltrud Probst won the 1997 Australian Open first round 6-4 2-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 1997* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Wiltrud Probst | 6-4 2-6 7-5 | Sandra Cacic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Wiltrud Probst | #794 | #31 | 344 | 1,757 | 119 | 161 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandra Cacic | Wiltrud Probst | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #80 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #105 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #69 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #113 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |