H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Sandra Cecchini vs Angelika Kanellopoulou H2H: 3-1
Sandra Cecchini holds a 3–1 lead over Angelika Kanellopoulou in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Sandra Cecchini leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Cecchini won the 1988 Rome fourth round 4-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 61
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 1988* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Sandra Cecchini | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Angelika Kanellopoulou | Match data |
| May 6, 1987* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Sandra Cecchini | 6-1 7-5 | Angelika Kanellopoulou | Match data |
| May 23, 1986* | Lugano | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Angelika Kanellopoulou | 6-4 6-2 | Sandra Cecchini | Match data |
| Jan 30, 1986* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sandra Cecchini | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Angelika Kanellopoulou | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Cecchini | #487 | #15 | 279 | 1,937 | 299 | 215 | 58.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
| Angelika Kanellopoulou | — | — | — | 1,718 | 71 | 88 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sandra Cecchini | Angelika Kanellopoulou | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 13–13 | 50.0% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #49 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #73 | 1,635 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #18 | 1,860 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 13–13 | 50.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #21 | 1,845 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #26 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #20 | 1,815 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,776 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #34 | 1,824 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,725 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #33 | 1,840 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #108 | 1,661 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,629 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #206 | 1,610 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,556 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |