H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Sandra Cecchini vs Nancy Feber H2H: 1-0

Sandra Cecchini holds a 1–0 lead over Nancy Feber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Cecchini leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sandra Cecchini won the 1994 Linz Open round of 32 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Nancy Feber
BEL Age 50 Left-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandra Cecchini #57 6-3 7-5 Nancy Feber #158 Match data Feb 10, 1994* R32 Linz Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,936 300 217 58.0% 0 0 0 2 9 11
Nancy Feber #589 #79 219 1,566 25 47 34.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sandra Cecchini Nancy Feber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0 1992 1–1 50.0% #165 1,502 0 0
17 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,484 0 0 1993 3–9 25.0% #152 1,486 0 0
18 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 0 1994 4–9 30.8% #124 1,482 0 0
19 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1 1995 9–12 42.9% #101 1,549 0 0
20 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2 1996 6–12 33.3% #109 1,513 0 0
21 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,633 0 3 1997 2–4 33.3% #177 1,516 0 0
22 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,859 0 5 — — — — — — —
23 1988 34–15 69.4% #21 1,843 0 7 — — — — — — —
24 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8 — — — — — — —
25 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,814 0 9 — — — — — — —
26 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,773 0 10 — — — — — — —
27 1992 24–16 60.0% #34 1,823 0 11 — — — — — — —
28 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,726 0 11 — — — — — — —
29 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11 — — — — — — —
30 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,628 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,608 0 11 — — — — — — —
33 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,555 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sandra Cecchini Nancy Feber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
18 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1984 12 4 16 75.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1985 6 7 13 46.2% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1996 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1987 8 4 12 66.7% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 29 8 37 78.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 21 9 30 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 40 42 82 48.8% 236 140 376 62.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 21 26 47 44.7% — 10 24 34 29.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 2 6 8 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sandra Cecchini Nancy Feber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1981 1478 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07 1992 1502 100.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.25
17 1982 1484 101.9 — — — — — +37 — 44.4% +0.11 1–0 — — +0.65 1993 1487 111.8 — — — — +51 — — 26.9% -1.54 1–1 — — -0.06
18 1983 1497 106.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.17 1994 1483 105.3 — — — — -15 — +102 36.7% -0.73 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.24
19 1984 1651 123.3 — — — — +49 -79 -56 53.9% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 +2.06 1995 1550 117.2 — — — — -78 — +71 45.8% -0.15 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — +0.43
20 1985 1747 132.3 — — — — -80 +43 — 51.1% -0.19 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 109.7 +0.71 1996 1513 113.7 — — — — -89 — +173 45.5% -0.27 0–8 (0%) 4–0 (100%) 95.3 +1.75
21 1986 1633 120.0 — — — — -65 +149 — 43.2% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 96.0 +0.42 1997 1516 106.1 — — — — -48 — — 40.0% -0.70 — 2–2 (50%) — +0.12
22 1987 1859 148.1 — — — — -141 +79 — 66.7% +1.10 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1988 1843 145.8 — — — — -149 +157 — 64.2% +1.10 9–2 (82%) 5–2 (71%) 107.7 +2.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1989 1799 128.9 — — — — -134 +134 — 59.4% +0.59 13–7 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 99.8 +3.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1990 1815 140.5 — — — — -136 +130 — 60.0% +0.83 10–5 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1991 1774 131.6 — — — — -138 +151 — 61.3% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 100.3 +1.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 1824 136.5 — — — — -222 +141 — 55.6% +0.29 8–2 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 1727 129.9 — — — — -151 +131 — 53.9% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 101.3 -0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 1841 138.9 — — — — -123 +6 — 57.0% +0.51 14–5 (74%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 1661 113.4 — — — — +36 +34 — 40.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 1629 109.5 — — — — +14 +62 — 52.4% +0.05 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 1608 106.4 — — — — — +32 — 39.1% -1.30 0–1 2–0 — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 1555 95.4 — — — — — +15 — 34.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1936 137.9 — — — — -93 +97 -56 55.5% +0.35 98–62 (61%) 42–34 (55%) 106.0 +2.91 — 1567 115.2 — — — — -40 — +114 40.7% -0.55 4–16 (20%) 7–4 (64%) 94.3 +3.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.