H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Sandra Cecchini vs Neige Dias H2H: 1-0

Sandra Cecchini holds a 1–0 lead over Neige Dias in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Cecchini leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandra Cecchini won the 1988 Bastad semifinal 1-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Neige Dias
BRA Age 59

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandra Cecchini #18 1-6 6-3 6-3 Neige Dias Match data Jul 9, 1988* SF Bastad WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,936 300 217 58.0% 0 0 0 2 9 11
Neige Dias — — — 1,748 75 75 50.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sandra Cecchini Neige Dias
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1981 2–3 40.0% — 1,493 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
16 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,484 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0
18 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 0 1985 6–12 33.3% — 1,527 0 0
19 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1 1986 19–19 50.0% — 1,610 0 0
20 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2 1987 12–15 44.4% — 1,647 0 1
21 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,633 0 3 1988 25–13 65.8% — 1,712 0 2
22 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,859 0 5 1989 9–10 47.4% — 1,673 0 2
23 1988 34–15 69.4% #21 1,843 0 7 — — — — — — —
24 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8 — — — — — — —
25 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,814 0 9 — — — — — — —
26 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,773 0 10 — — — — — — —
27 1992 24–16 60.0% #34 1,823 0 11 — — — — — — —
28 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,726 0 11 — — — — — — —
29 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11 — — — — — — —
30 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,628 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,608 0 11 — — — — — — —
33 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,555 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sandra Cecchini Neige Dias
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1984 12 4 16 75.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 6 7 13 46.2% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
20 1985 6 7 13 46.2% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1987 5 8 13 38.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1988 7 6 13 53.8% 18 7 25 72.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1987 8 4 12 66.7% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — —
23 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 29 8 37 78.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 21 9 30 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 40 42 82 48.8% 236 140 376 62.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 21 26 47 44.7% — 19 27 46 41.3% 47 35 82 57.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sandra Cecchini Neige Dias
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1493 96.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 2–0 1–0 — -0.12
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1497 97.5 — — — — — +31 — 50.0% -0.63 — — — +0.58
16 1981 1478 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 1484 101.9 — — — — — +37 — 44.4% +0.11 1–0 — — +0.65 1984 1482 98.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.16
18 1983 1497 106.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.17 1985 1528 114.5 — — — — +21 +57 — 28.9% -1.66 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -0.55
19 1984 1651 123.3 — — — — +49 -79 -56 53.9% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 +2.06 1986 1611 116.1 — — — — +2 -17 -16 50.6% -0.05 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 100.1 +4.40
20 1985 1747 132.3 — — — — -80 +43 — 51.1% -0.19 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 109.7 +0.71 1987 1648 123.5 — — — — -61 +20 — 46.8% -0.05 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 97.3 +1.34
21 1986 1633 120.0 — — — — -65 +149 — 43.2% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 96.0 +0.42 1988 1712 129.5 — — — — -100 +84 — 62.1% +0.79 7–4 (64%) 5–0 (100%) 107.2 +2.97
22 1987 1859 148.1 — — — — -141 +79 — 66.7% +1.10 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.44 1989 1674 112.9 — — — — — +55 — 47.8% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 101.3 +0.66
23 1988 1843 145.8 — — — — -149 +157 — 64.2% +1.10 9–2 (82%) 5–2 (71%) 107.7 +2.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1989 1799 128.9 — — — — -134 +134 — 59.4% +0.59 13–7 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 99.8 +3.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1990 1815 140.5 — — — — -136 +130 — 60.0% +0.83 10–5 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1991 1774 131.6 — — — — -138 +151 — 61.3% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 100.3 +1.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 1824 136.5 — — — — -222 +141 — 55.6% +0.29 8–2 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 1727 129.9 — — — — -151 +131 — 53.9% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 101.3 -0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 1841 138.9 — — — — -123 +6 — 57.0% +0.51 14–5 (74%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 1661 113.4 — — — — +36 +34 — 40.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 1629 109.5 — — — — +14 +62 — 52.4% +0.05 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 1608 106.4 — — — — — +32 — 39.1% -1.30 0–1 2–0 — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 1555 95.4 — — — — — +15 — 34.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1936 137.9 — — — — -93 +97 -56 55.5% +0.35 98–62 (61%) 42–34 (55%) 106.0 +2.91 — 1749 122.0 — — — — -40 +47 -16 49.3% -0.13 24–21 (53%) 19–7 (73%) 109.2 +6.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.