H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sandra Kleinova vs Elena Pampoulova H2H: 0-1
Elena Pampoulova holds a 1–0 lead over Sandra Kleinova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena Pampoulova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elena Pampoulova won the 1996 Budapest fourth round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 48
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BUL
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 1996* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Elena Pampoulova | 6-3 6-1 | Sandra Kleinova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Kleinova | #759 | #41 | 606 | 1,633 | 59 | 119 | 33.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Elena Pampoulova | — | — | — | 1,658 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandra Kleinova | Elena Pampoulova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1995 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #128 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #42 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 3–20 | 13.0% | #163 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #63 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #127 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2001 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #121 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–10 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #87 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2004 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #145 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 1 |