H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Sandra Wasserman vs Cecilia Dahlman H2H: 1-0

Sandra Wasserman holds a 1–0 lead over Cecilia Dahlman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Wasserman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandra Wasserman won the 1988 Bastad quarterfinal 6-2 7-6.

BEL Age 56 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
SWE Age 58 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandra Wasserman #101 6-2 7-6 Cecilia Dahlman #282 Match data Jul 9, 1988* QF Bastad WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sandra Wasserman #747 #48 22 1,701 77 93 45.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cecilia Dahlman #405 #63 17 1,673 38 63 37.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sandra Wasserman Cecilia Dahlman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1985 0–1 0.0% #297 1,482 0 0
17 1987 7–4 63.6% #123 1,596 0 0
18 1988 19–18 51.4% #63 1,643 0 0
19 1989 18–17 51.4% #69 1,632 0 0 1988 2–5 28.6% #165 1,478 0 0
20 1990 12–17 41.4% #103 1,607 0 0 1989 9–9 50.0% #94 1,585 0 1
21 1991 6–10 37.5% #131 1,583 0 0 1990 16–20 44.4% #82 1,639 0 2
22 1992 3–8 27.3% #135 1,538 0 0 1991 6–18 25.0% #189 1,490 0 2
23 1993 8–11 42.1% #112 1,556 0 0 1992 2–4 33.3% #123 1,497 0 2
24 1994 4–8 33.3% #198 1,540 0 0 1993 3–6 33.3% #192 1,512 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sandra Wasserman Cecilia Dahlman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1985 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
18 1988 8 5 13 61.5% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
19 1989 13 8 21 61.9% 4 8 12 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 0 4 4 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1991 1 4 5 20.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1994 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 42 43 85 49.4% 30 39 69 43.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 18 24 25.0% 22 28 50 44.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 7 9 16 43.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sandra Wasserman Cecilia Dahlman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1985 1482 96.1 0.0% -2.50 +0.21
17 1987 1596 125.6 +39 64.0% +1.32 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.79
18 1988 1644 115.1 -32 +14 -112 51.1% +0.01 8–8 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 100.3 +4.28
19 1989 1633 118.0 +44 -43 50.6% +0.13 5–6 (45%) 0–5 (0%) 96.1 +3.24 1988 1478 107.9 +33 38.9% -0.72 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 99.2 +0.25
20 1990 1608 122.9 +64 -90 44.1% -0.71 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 98.4 -0.61 1989 1586 124.1 -77 +74 47.6% -0.36 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 100.9 +1.53
21 1991 1583 107.2 +19 -21 36.1% -1.03 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) 101.4 +0.37 1990 1640 129.0 -81 +22 -22 46.3% -0.49 3–5 (38%) 6–0 (100%) 104.5 +0.28
22 1992 1539 107.3 +30 +11 33.3% -1.13 0–2 0–1 +0.37 1991 1490 103.6 +47 +73 +72 26.5% -1.57 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.0 +1.03
23 1993 1556 112.7 +1 +2 42.9% -0.43 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) +0.49 1992 1497 105.9 +33 40.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–0 +0.33
24 1994 1540 109.0 -5 30.8% -1.23 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 101.0 -0.21 1993 1513 115.6 +90 35.0% -1.05 1–1 0–3 (0%) -0.48
Career 1702 120.3 +26 -5 -112 45.9% -0.30 25–29 (46%) 16–19 (46%) 95.3 +5.13 1673 122.0 -16 +52 +9 39.8% -0.82 12–16 (43%) 13–9 (59%) 101.7 +3.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.