H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Sandra Wasserman vs Donna Faber H2H: 2-0

Sandra Wasserman holds a 2–0 lead over Donna Faber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sandra Wasserman leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Wasserman won the 1992 Roland Garros round of 64 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sandra Wasserman
BEL Age 56 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Donna Faber
USA Age 55

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandra Wasserman #141 7-5 6-4 Donna Faber #85 Match data May 28, 1992* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Sandra Wasserman #65 6-2 6-4 Donna Faber #80 Match data Mar 21, 1989* R128 Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sandra Wasserman #747 #48 22 1,701 77 93 45.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Donna Faber #227 #55 19 1,718 68 97 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sandra Wasserman Donna Faber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #218 1,495 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1988 6–9 40.0% #131 1,532 0 0
17 1987 7–4 63.6% #123 1,596 0 0 1989 19–19 50.0% #59 1,674 0 0
18 1988 19–18 51.4% #63 1,643 0 0 1990 15–18 45.5% #84 1,630 0 0
19 1989 18–17 51.4% #69 1,632 0 0 1991 15–19 44.1% #99 1,593 0 0
20 1990 12–17 41.4% #103 1,607 0 0 1992 11–20 35.5% #116 1,541 0 0
21 1991 6–10 37.5% #131 1,583 0 0 1993 1–10 9.1% #227 1,431 0 0
22 1992 3–8 27.3% #135 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1993 8–11 42.1% #112 1,556 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1994 4–8 33.3% #198 1,540 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sandra Wasserman Donna Faber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
17 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1989 15 10 25 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1988 8 5 13 61.5% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1990 5 7 12 41.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1989 13 8 21 61.9% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 8 12 20 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1991 1 4 5 20.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1994 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 43 85 49.4% 30 39 69 43.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 6 9 33.3% — 42 53 95 44.2% 19 29 48 39.6% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sandra Wasserman Donna Faber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1496 103.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.17 — — — +0.11
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1532 112.2 — — — — +4 +14 — 40.6% -0.63 1–1 1–1 — +0.30
17 1987 1596 125.6 — — — — — +39 — 64.0% +1.32 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.79 1989 1675 137.0 — — — — +40 -169 -99 48.9% +0.16 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 +1.23
18 1988 1644 115.1 — — — — -32 +14 -112 51.1% +0.01 8–8 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 100.3 +4.28 1990 1631 115.4 — — — — -7 -19 -43 43.1% -0.68 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.90
19 1989 1633 118.0 — — — — +44 -43 — 50.6% +0.13 5–6 (45%) 0–5 (0%) 96.1 +3.24 1991 1593 109.9 — — — — -20 +38 +10 41.3% -0.77 9–3 (75%) 4–5 (44%) 106.2 +1.62
20 1990 1608 122.9 — — — — +64 -90 — 44.1% -0.71 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 98.4 -0.61 1992 1542 119.9 — — — — +26 +37 — 38.0% -0.77 4–5 (44%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.56
21 1991 1583 107.2 — — — — +19 -21 — 36.1% -1.03 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) 101.4 +0.37 1993 1432 94.2 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -2.12 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 97.5 +0.77
22 1992 1539 107.3 — — — — +30 +11 — 33.3% -1.13 0–2 0–1 — +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1993 1556 112.7 — — — — +1 +2 — 42.9% -0.43 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1994 1540 109.0 — — — — -5 — — 30.8% -1.23 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 101.0 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1702 120.3 — — — — +26 -5 -112 45.9% -0.30 25–29 (46%) 16–19 (46%) 95.3 +5.13 — 1719 121.4 — — — — +14 -11 -44 41.2% -0.60 26–20 (57%) 13–17 (43%) 103.5 +3.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.