H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sandra Wasserman vs Donna Faber H2H: 2-0
Sandra Wasserman holds a 2–0 lead over Donna Faber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sandra Wasserman leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Wasserman won the 1992 Roland Garros second round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 56
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1992* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Sandra Wasserman | 7-5 6-4 | Donna Faber | Match data |
| Mar 21, 1989* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R128 | Hard | Sandra Wasserman | 6-2 6-4 | Donna Faber | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Wasserman | #747 | #48 | 22 | 1,702 | 77 | 93 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Donna Faber | #227 | #55 | 19 | 1,718 | 68 | 97 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sandra Wasserman | Donna Faber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1987 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #123 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #63 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #103 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #116 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #227 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #135 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1993 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #112 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1994 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #198 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |